2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast algorithm for finding most influential people based on the linear threshold model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they also study two most popular information propagation models in social networks, i.e. independent cascade model [14], [23] and linear threshold model [24], [25], and propose a ''hill-climbing'' greedy algorithm to solve this problem based on the two models. And experimental results show that this algorithm is much better than degree-based heuristic algorithms in terms of result accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they also study two most popular information propagation models in social networks, i.e. independent cascade model [14], [23] and linear threshold model [24], [25], and propose a ''hill-climbing'' greedy algorithm to solve this problem based on the two models. And experimental results show that this algorithm is much better than degree-based heuristic algorithms in terms of result accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, this algorithm finds out ancestor nodes of all source nodes, and calculates the maximum active probability between ancestor nodes and source nodes (lines 3-29). Specifically, for each source node, ancestor nodes of this node are sought by utilizing Dijkstra algorithm and maximum active probability between them is calculated (lines [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In this process, visit is used to mark whether a node has been visited.…”
Section: A: Computation Of Ancestor Nodes and Maximum Active Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CELF++ method can further improve the computational efficiency, which is reported to be about 35%-55% faster than CELF method. Motivated by the existence of community in a network, several work [8,36,41] have focused on employing the communities of the network, and proposing more efficient algorithms to speed up the seed selection. Additionally, instead of Monte Carlo simulation-based method, various heuristic algorithms have also been proposed to improve the efficiency in evaluating the influence spread for a given seed set in the greedy algorithm.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Influence Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies on the diffusion models of influence maximization are mainly classified into epidemic model() and game‐theoretic model. () Epidemic‐based diffusion model usually includes Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Ising model, linear threshold model (LT),() and independent cascade (IC) model.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() Epidemic‐based diffusion model usually includes Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Ising model, linear threshold model (LT),() and independent cascade (IC) model. () In Kempe et al, influence maximization problem based on LT and IC models was explored. In both LT and IC models, each node had only one chance to activate its neighbors.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%