1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)00113-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast algorithm for −1 factorization of Toeplitz matrices

Abstract: A fast algorithm foT solving large scale MV (mean-variance) portfolio optimization problems is proposed, It is shown that by using T independent data representing the rate of return of the assets, the MV model consisting of n assets can be put into a quadratic program with n + T variables, T linear constraints and T quadratic terms in the objective function. As a result, the computation t,ime required to solve this problem wou}d increase very mildly as a function of n. This implies that a very laJ:ge scale MV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given SP.1, (21) may not need to be solved from scratch every sample; it can be done at a decimated rate of once every samples. If so, the average per-sample complexity figures for solving (13) Referring to (14), (27) indicates that, even at , the Ratchet approach offers a computational saving over the Levinson-Durbin's approach, whereas the two lead to virtually the same solution.…”
Section: Approach 2: Ratchetmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given SP.1, (21) may not need to be solved from scratch every sample; it can be done at a decimated rate of once every samples. If so, the average per-sample complexity figures for solving (13) Referring to (14), (27) indicates that, even at , the Ratchet approach offers a computational saving over the Levinson-Durbin's approach, whereas the two lead to virtually the same solution.…”
Section: Approach 2: Ratchetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For clarity, we now introduce for a matrix or vector a subscript (13) with being symmetric and Toeplitz. To solve (13) with a general RHS, the well-known LevinsonDurbin's recursion [8] requires and (14) This is the approach [6] uses. Being a generalization of an approach proposed in [16] and adopted in [17], our proposal takes advantage of SP.3 to simplify the process.…”
Section: Approach 2: Ratchetmentioning
confidence: 99%