1990
DOI: 10.1177/107769909006700126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Factor Analysis of Broom and Smith's Public Relations Roles Scale

Abstract: This mail survey of 136 public relations practitioners in Washington State reveals that public relations tasks are most easily sorted into two — those of manager or technician. Factor analysis suggests that earlier study divisions into four distinct roles are hard to defend because of role overlap. This study suggests the need to rework the Broom and Smith public relations role scale.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, an important throughline in JMCQ research in the 1990s was to describe and prescribe the roles of public relations practitioners (Lauzen, 1994; Leichty & Springston, 1996; Rentner & Bissland, 1990; Reagan et al, 1990; Ryan & Martinson, 1990; Shamir et al, 1990; Springston & Leichty, 1994). Ultimately, a valid theoretical description of practitioners’ roles would allow academics to further diagnose organizational constraints preventing better public relations behavior, but it would also allow practitioners to understand their own capacities to rectify public relations mismanagement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an important throughline in JMCQ research in the 1990s was to describe and prescribe the roles of public relations practitioners (Lauzen, 1994; Leichty & Springston, 1996; Rentner & Bissland, 1990; Reagan et al, 1990; Ryan & Martinson, 1990; Shamir et al, 1990; Springston & Leichty, 1994). Ultimately, a valid theoretical description of practitioners’ roles would allow academics to further diagnose organizational constraints preventing better public relations behavior, but it would also allow practitioners to understand their own capacities to rectify public relations mismanagement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryan (1987) reported that while PR managers report having line responsibility for the various communication decision areas, they did not appear to be the sole decision makers. Reagan et al (1990) added further support for this position. They found that PR managers were only minor participants in advertising and promotion decisions, and played no role in sales force and distribution decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The higher loadings for hoth women and men on Factor 2 were implementing decisions made by others; writing, editing, and producing messages; disseminating messages; handling correspondence and making telephone calls; implementing event planning/logistics; making media contacts; and implementing new programs (see Tables 3 and 4). Broom and Dozier called public relations practitioners "technicians" if their work focused on such activities as writing public relations materials, editing and/or rewriting for grammar and spelling; handling the technical aspects, producing brochures or pamphlets, doing photography and graphics, and maintaining media contacts and placing press releases (Reagan et al, 1990, p. 180).…”
Section: A Two-factor Construct: Managers and Techniciansmentioning
confidence: 98%