1946
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02365.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Factor Analysis of Body Measurements for British Adult Males

Abstract: The articles published by the Annals of Eugenics (1925–1954) have been made available online as an historical archive intended for scholarly use. The work of eugenicists was often pervaded by prejudice against racial, ethnic and disabled groups. The online publication of this material for scholarly research purposes is not an endorsement of those views nor a promotion of eugenics in any way.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1948
1948
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests to see whether the measurement scales were uni-dimensional were also undertaken. Further, items in each scale were excluded based on low communality (<0.5 as per Burt and Banks 1947) and/or multi-factorial loadings. Alphas range from 0.66 to 0.93 and were considered acceptable for analysis.…”
Section: Measures Of Relationship Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests to see whether the measurement scales were uni-dimensional were also undertaken. Further, items in each scale were excluded based on low communality (<0.5 as per Burt and Banks 1947) and/or multi-factorial loadings. Alphas range from 0.66 to 0.93 and were considered acceptable for analysis.…”
Section: Measures Of Relationship Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four factors were rotated analytically to the normalized varimax criterion. For each factor, the significance of individual factor loadings was tested by the method proposed by Burt and Banks (1947).…”
Section: --_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance of the successive centroid factors was investigated by the formula of Burt and Banks (1947) for the standard error of a factor loading. Adopting Vernon's suggestion (1950,130) that a factor be accepted as statistically significant if about half its loadings exceed twice their standard errors we see that for each analysis Factors 11, 111 and IV may be accepted as significant.…”
Section: G Y O U~ Test 81 ; (Ii) the Second Peel Group Test Of Practimentioning
confidence: 99%