2002
DOI: 10.1007/s002890200020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A facile method of determination for distribution of the substituent in O-methylcelluloses using 1H-NMR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of the different peaks was performed as described in ref. 38–40. As shown, the spectrum of the pristine MC was the same as that for the plasma-treated sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The identification of the different peaks was performed as described in ref. 38–40. As shown, the spectrum of the pristine MC was the same as that for the plasma-treated sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Analysis of the spectra was performed after identification of the different signals according to the literature [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 H-NMR spectroscopy may also be used to characterize methylcellulose. A 1 H-NMR spectrum of MC is shown in Figure 3 with the attribution of the main resonances [27,28]. The spectrum shows intense signals at 3.48-3.47 ppm corresponding to the overlapping of methyl protons at C-2 and C-3, and at 3.31 ppm attributed to methyl protons at C-6.…”
Section: Substitution Patternmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed 13 C chemical shift assignment of HPMCAS was recently published, 27 with the conventional cellulose C1 and C4 assignments to 104 and 84 ppm, as well as an attribution of the signal at 61 ppm to C5, an OCH moiety. Here, we demonstrate, based on quantitative 13 C NMR 28 combined with spectral editing 29,30 and empirical chemical shift predictions as well as 1D and 2D solution-NMR data for methylcellulose, [31][32][33] cellulose acetate, 34,35 and HPMC 36,37 in the literature, that the peaks of C2-C6 and C9 in HPMCAS 27 were actually misassigned. A key factor is that ether formation can raise OCH n chemical shifts by up to 10 ppm relative to the corresponding HOCH n forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%