2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-011-0242-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic-programming-based exact algorithm for general single-machine scheduling with machine idle time

Abstract: This paper proposes an efficient exact algorithm for the general single-machine scheduling problem where machine idle time is permitted. The algorithm is an extension of the authors' previous algorithm for the problem without machine idle time, which is based on the SSDP (Successive Sublimation Dynamic Programming) method. We first extend our previous algorithm to the problem with machine idle time and next propose several improvements. Then, the proposed algorithm is applied to four types of singlemachine sch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this framework the authors were able to solve instances with up to 200 jobs to the proven optimality. Later, Tanaka and Fujikuma (2012) developed a DP based algorithm that considers state elimination, dominance rules and Lagrangean relaxation concepts. To the best of our knowledge, this method represents the state-of-the-art approach for solving the 1|r j | w j C j , being able to solve to the proven optimality instances with up to 200 jobs much faster than Pan and Shi's method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this framework the authors were able to solve instances with up to 200 jobs to the proven optimality. Later, Tanaka and Fujikuma (2012) developed a DP based algorithm that considers state elimination, dominance rules and Lagrangean relaxation concepts. To the best of our knowledge, this method represents the state-of-the-art approach for solving the 1|r j | w j C j , being able to solve to the proven optimality instances with up to 200 jobs much faster than Pan and Shi's method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best result for this problem to date is achieved by dynamic-programming-based exact algorithm (Tanaka and Fujikuma 2012). An initial lower bound is calculated by solving a Lagrangian relaxation of the original problem via dynamic programming.…”
Section: Earliness/tardiness Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several heuristics with excellent empirical performance are available for both 1// j π j T j and 1// j π j T j + ǫ j E j to perform the latter task. However, in this work we rely on the recent powerful optimal algorithms of Tanaka et al (2009) and Tanaka and Fujikuma (2012) to handle the single machine problems as we mentioned in Section 1. Our computational experiments in Section 5 ultimately support this decision.…”
Section: Preemptive Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we recognize that the main practical difficulty of solving Rm-TWT and Rm-TWET to (near-) optimality is determining a good job partition, and we directly incorporate this aspect of the problem into our rationale for developing this particular relaxation. Once a job partition is available, we rely on recent advances by Tanaka et al (2009) and Tanaka and Fujikuma (2012) to solve m independent single machine TWT or TWET problems, respectively, to construct a non-preemptive solution of high quality to the original unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem. The downside of our preemptive relaxation is that it is formulated as a difficult mixed integer linear program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%