2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-014-0452-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic finite element model of human cervical spine with in vivo kinematic validation

Abstract: Most previous cervical spine finite element (FE) models were validated using in vitro cadaver measurement data from literatures. Although in vitro measurement can provide valuable data for model verification, the in vivo mechanical and physiological conditions of the cervical spine during its natural motions cannot be reproduced in vitro. In this study, a human FE model of skull (C0) and spinal vertebrae (C1-T1) was developed. The in vivo kinematic characteristics of head and neck were obtained from optoelectr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fifth and sixth cervical vertebral levels (C5–C6) were extracted from the previously reported cervical finite element (FE) model [15]. The fixed element (FE) model of the vertebra consists of an inferior endplate, a superior endplate, a cancellous core, a cortical wall, and a posterior structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth and sixth cervical vertebral levels (C5–C6) were extracted from the previously reported cervical finite element (FE) model [15]. The fixed element (FE) model of the vertebra consists of an inferior endplate, a superior endplate, a cancellous core, a cortical wall, and a posterior structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been used for acquiring the dataset for the geometric construction varying from using literature data [71], average measured data [36] to subject-specific medical imaging data [31,32,39,41,44,45,48,52,53,56,[58][59][60]62,66,68,84]. For geometric construction of bones, the most widely used approach is based on computed tomography (CT) imaging data, for example, the CT image databases for the modelling of the cervical spine and hip joint in our previous studies [85,86]. While in some studies the bone geometry was measured directly in cadaveric dissections or used the datasets from literature [32,39,48,56].…”
Section: Fe Shoulder Modelling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the FE simulation analyses in most of the studies were only limited to the static or quasi‐static condition. We have applied dynamic FE simulation analysis to study cervical spine and foot biomechanics , and have an ongoing study to use dynamic FE analysis to investigate the in vivo functioning of the shoulder complex. Physiologically more realistic loading and boundary conditions are likely to provide the best way to predict the tissue stress environment in vivo.…”
Section: Fe Shoulder Modelling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we are interested in measuring the minute strain of the leg segments as the leg steps, but to reduce runtime, multi-body physics simulators almost always model segments as “rigid bodies” that cannot bend. Computational modeling techniques such as Finite Element Analysis (FEA) are extremely useful for predicting how complex shapes such as insect leg segments would strain when stressed and have yielded valuable insights into how insects detect strain ( Kaliyamoorthy et al, 2001 ; Wang et al, 2014 , 2019 ; Noda et al, 2018 ; Dinges et al, 2022 ). However, determining and applying a realistic stress profile to the model is a challenging problem, which a robotic model inherently solves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%