2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.25.008078
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic 6,000-year genetic history of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe

Abstract: SummaryThe Eastern Eurasian Steppe was home to historic empires of nomadic pastoralists, including the Xiongnu and the Mongols. However, little is known about the region’s population history. Here we reveal its dynamic genetic history by analyzing new genome-wide data for 214 ancient individuals spanning 6,000 years. We identify a pastoralist expansion into Mongolia ca. 3000 BCE, and by the Late Bronze Age, Mongolian populations were biogeographically structured into three distinct groups, all practicing dairy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is especially telling that the most frequent ConqE Hgs (N1a1a1a1, its derivative N1a1a1a1a and T1a1) were present in numerous commoner cemeteries. The east Eurasian N1a1a1a1 ConqE marker most likely originated from the Afanasievo or Sintashta–Tagar cultures [ 37 , 38 ], while, despite its general Eurasian range, a Mongolian Chemurchek–Uyuk–Deer stone–khirigsuur [ 39 ] origin of T1a1 in ConqE is very plausible ( Table S3c ). The close SHD distance of ConqE to Steppe EMBA and Steppe MLBA populations ( Table S5b ) implies that the Steppe EMBA affinity of ConqC, observed in Figure 4 , can also be a consequence of ConqE admixture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is especially telling that the most frequent ConqE Hgs (N1a1a1a1, its derivative N1a1a1a1a and T1a1) were present in numerous commoner cemeteries. The east Eurasian N1a1a1a1 ConqE marker most likely originated from the Afanasievo or Sintashta–Tagar cultures [ 37 , 38 ], while, despite its general Eurasian range, a Mongolian Chemurchek–Uyuk–Deer stone–khirigsuur [ 39 ] origin of T1a1 in ConqE is very plausible ( Table S3c ). The close SHD distance of ConqE to Steppe EMBA and Steppe MLBA populations ( Table S5b ) implies that the Steppe EMBA affinity of ConqC, observed in Figure 4 , can also be a consequence of ConqE admixture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also reanalyzed the available 37 ancient DNA of haplogroup C2a‐L1373 (Cui et al, 2020; de Barros Damgaard et al, 2018; P. Flegontov et al, 2019; Jeong et al, 2020; J. Li et al, 2018; Narasimhan et al, 2019; Ning et al, 2020; Posth et al, 2018; Sikora et al, 2019; Yu et al, 2020) (Figure 1, Figure S1, and Table S1). The 7.4,000‐year‐old NEO239 individual from Devils Gate 5 site is positive on Y‐SNP BY119182 (Sikora et al, 2019); thus belong to haplogroup C2a2‐MPB373.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the data of 37 ancient male individuals of C2a‐L1373 were also included in this study, so as to determine the accurate subbranch of these samples on the revised phylogenetic tree (Table S1). However, since the raw data is unavailable for the 19 samples from Jeong et al (2020), the subbranch of these samples was directly adopted from the reference (Jeong et al, 2020). The details of data processing and Y‐SNP calling results of ancient DNA were indicated in Supplementary text.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eastward expansion of the steppe pastoralists and their descendants gradually admixed or replaced by local indigenous steppe nomads and formed the multi-originated Scythian pastoralist tribes (Damgaard et al, 2018), as well as the later formed Xiongnu/Xianbei/Rouran/Uyghur/Turkic/Mongolic confederations. These eastern Eurasian nomadic pastoralist empires became the dominant groups and their subsequent westward migrations reshaped the genetic landscape of populations from the Eurasian steppe once again (Damgaard et al, 2018;Jeong et al, 2020). Modern Eurasian population genomic history also documented the large-scale western-eastern Eurasian admixture and massive population movement (Yunusbayev et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sichuan Hui mainly distributed in many areas of the northwestern, southern, northern and eastern Sichuan with a population size over 0.11 million. Here, we obtained high-density SNPs data in 49 Hui people and 60 neighboring Han individuals and made one of the most comprehensive population comparisons based on the co-analysis of genome-wide data among all available modern and ancient Eurasian reference populations (Jeong et al, 2020;Ning et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020a;Yang et al, 2020). We aimed to solve the following two questions: I) determine the extent of genetic heterogeneity or homogeneity among geographically different Hui people or between Hui and their adjacent neighbors; II) explore the timing, admixture sources and origin of modern Hui and to validate which models (Cultural diffusion versus demic diffusion) played the key role in the formation process of modern Sichuan Hui.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%