2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ductile fracture analysis using a local damage model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, fc is not only a material parameter, but depends on several factors as f0 or stress triaxiality. For instance, fc increases if f0 increases [40]. Our results show that for DCI, fc is also dependent on temperature when a critical value is reached.…”
Section: Void Growth Damage Model With Temperature For Monotonous Tenmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, fc is not only a material parameter, but depends on several factors as f0 or stress triaxiality. For instance, fc increases if f0 increases [40]. Our results show that for DCI, fc is also dependent on temperature when a critical value is reached.…”
Section: Void Growth Damage Model With Temperature For Monotonous Tenmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…(8) as a function of plastic strain is obtained from the uniaxial tension test data provided by the experimental group. The initial GTN model parameters of steels are based on refs (Bauvineau et al 1996;Decamp et al 1997;Siegmund et al 1998;Schmitt et al 1997;Skallerud and Zhang 1997;Benseddiq and Imad 2008). q 1 = 1.5, q 2 = 1, E N = 0.3, S N = 0.1, f 0 ≈ 0 and f F ≈ 0.2 are the standard material parameters for steel.…”
Section: Calibration Of Materials Model and Failure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical algorithm based on Cockcroft-Latham criterion (Choi et al 2010) and Gurson-TvergaardNeedleman damage model (Tang et al 2011) was applied to study the damage evolution in the cold extrusion and the multi-pass wire drawing process respectively. The damage criteria are classified into coupled approaches which incorporate damage accumulation into the constitutive equations (Tvergaard 1990;La Rosa et al 2001;Benseddiq and Imad 2008;Xue et al 2010) and uncoupled categories which neglect the effects of damage on the yield surface of materials (Ayada et al 1984;Alberti et al 1993;Wierzbicki et al 2005). This latter approach has been widely adopted due to its simple formulation and ease of calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%