The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1357/0022240053693842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-diffusive interface tank for dynamic-response studies

Abstract: A large tank capable of long-term maintenance of a sharp temperature-salinity interface has been developed and applied to measurements of the dynamical response of oceanographic sensors. A two-layer salt-stratified system is heated from below and cooled from above to provide two convectively mixed layers with a thin double-diffusive interface separating them. A temperature jump exceeding 10°C can be maintained over 1-2 cm (a vertical temperature gradient of order 10 3°C /m) for several weeks. A variable speed-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the lower interface showed significant disagreement, where (aside from the first profile) the PME estimate is consistently 2 to 3 times smaller than what was observed. This could be because the buoyancy flux through the bottom of the tank has been underestimated, although estimating the flux from the four observed migration rates that disagree leads to heat fluxes 2 to 3 times those measured previously (Q=800 to 1100 W as compared with 400 W from Schmitt et al (2005)). …”
Section: Evolution Of Multiple Interfaces and Inferred Migration Ratesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only the lower interface showed significant disagreement, where (aside from the first profile) the PME estimate is consistently 2 to 3 times smaller than what was observed. This could be because the buoyancy flux through the bottom of the tank has been underestimated, although estimating the flux from the four observed migration rates that disagree leads to heat fluxes 2 to 3 times those measured previously (Q=800 to 1100 W as compared with 400 W from Schmitt et al (2005)). …”
Section: Evolution Of Multiple Interfaces and Inferred Migration Ratesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The temperatures that either the heater or chiller were set to were noted throughout the experiments, but no direct measurements of these temperatures were made. Previous measurements of the heat supplied to the tank through the bottom boundary showed Q ≈ 400W (Schmitt et al, 2005). Inverting (5), this would give J ≈ 3 to 4 × 10 −7 m 2 /s 3 .…”
Section: Fluxes Across the Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This effect can either be investigated experimentally, theoretically or numerically given sufficient resources. We have recently become aware of an experimental facility at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution operated by the Schmitt Fluid Dynamics group in Quissett, MA [111]. The facility includes a tank with vertical dimensions of 10 m and a circular cross section with a diameter of 2 m. The tank has the added capability of being temperature or salt stratified, controlled by internal sensors to set the degree of stratification.…”
Section: Effects Of Multiple-animal Interactions On Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%