The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-008-0570-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory observations of double-diffusive convection using high-frequency broadband acoustics

Abstract: High-frequency broadband (200-300 kHz) acoustic scattering techniques have been used to observe the diffusive regime of double-diffusive convection in the laboratory. Pulse compression signal processing techniques allow 1) centimetre-scale interface thickness to be rapidly, remotely, and continuously measured, 2) the evolution, and ultimate merging, of multiple interfaces to be observed at high-resolution, and 3) convection cells within the surrounding mixed layers to be observed. The acoustically measured int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Layer thickness is therefore a quantity that cannot be discussed independently of the history of the system. The process has not been studied very extensively (but see Wirtz & Reddy 1979, McDougall 1981, Young & Rosner 2000, Ross & Lavery 2009, and the coffee table experiment in ZS13). The layer thickness increases by a process of merging of neighboring layers.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layer thickness is therefore a quantity that cannot be discussed independently of the history of the system. The process has not been studied very extensively (but see Wirtz & Reddy 1979, McDougall 1981, Young & Rosner 2000, Ross & Lavery 2009, and the coffee table experiment in ZS13). The layer thickness increases by a process of merging of neighboring layers.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires a model for the layer thickness, for which no good theory is available. Observations in laboratory experiments and in geophysical cases show that layer thickness is not constant, but grows in time by processes in the merging of neighbouring layers (McDougall 1981;Ross & Lavery 2009, see also the numerical experiment in Young & Rosner 2000). Layer thickness can therefore not be treated independently of the history of the system.…”
Section: Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layers slowly merge, either by fading of contrast between neighbouring layers, or the vertical migration of interfaces towards adjacent layers. The details of this process have not been studied much (but see McDougall 1981;Young & Rosner 2000;Ross & Lavery 2009). A plausible estimate of the rate of growth of the layer thickness can be given in terms of the effective solute diffusivity of the system, however (S13, and Sect.…”
Section: Layer Formation Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layers slowly merge, either by fading of contrast between neighboring layers, or the vertical migration of interfaces towards adjacent layers. The details of this process have not been studied much (but see McDougall 1981, Young & Rosner 2000, Ross & Lavery 2009. A plausible estimate of the rate of growth of the layer thickness can be given in terms of the effective solute diffusivity of the system, however (S13, and Sect.…”
Section: Layer Formation Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires a model for the layer thickness, for which no good theory is available. Observations in laboratory experiments and in geophysical cases show that layer thickness is not constant, but grows in time by processes of merging of neighboring layers (McDougall 1981, Ross & Lavery 2009, see also the numerical experiment in Young & Rosner 2000). Layer thickness can therefore not be treated independently of the history of the system.…”
Section: Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%