A DOSE-RESPONSE FUNCTION FOR THE IMPACT OF O<sub>3</sub> ON ONTARIO-GROWN WHITE BEAN AND AN ESTIMATE OF ECONOMIC LOSS

Adomait, E. J.; Ensing, J.; Hofstra, G.

doi:10.4141/cjps87-015

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results Of Two-treatment Edu Studies1

Regional Economic Assessments Of Crop Loss1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1988

1997

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent7

Authors

Journals

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In discussing results, some authors (2,12,88,89) concluded that differences in yield between EDU-treated and nontreated plants were due to EOU induced protection from 03. Others (4,15,45,51,70) have been more cautious and have interpreted differences as simply an EOU effect that could be due to EOU-suppression of 03 damage or possibly caused by EOU effects per-se on yield.…”

Section: Results Of Two-treatment Edu Studiesmentioning

confidence: 95%

Ozone and Crop Yield*

Heagle¹

1989

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.

306

147

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Results Of Two-treatment Edu Studiesmentioning

confidence: 95%

Ozone and Crop Yield*

Heagle¹

1989

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.

306

147

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several econometric approaches of varying sophistication have been applied to the assessment of crop damage due to ozone pollution (Benson et al, 1982;Leung et al, 1982;Page et al, 1982;Spash, 1987;Adomait, Ensing and Hofstra, 1987). An example of an econometric model which analyses producers' surplus changes is presented and then the dual approach is discussed and referenced separately.…”

Section: Regional Economic Assessments Of Crop Lossmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Economic Benefits to Agriculture from Air Pollution Control

Spash

1997

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural crop production is highly dependent upon environmental conditions among which air quality plays a central role. Various air pollutants have been identified as a potential influence on commercial crops including SO 2 , NOx, O 3 and CO 2 . In particular, ozone in the lower atmosphere has been identified as a serious cause of crop loss in the United States and seems likely to be creating similar losses in Europe. In this paper the methods which can be applied to assess the economic damages from air pollution are critically reviewed. This requires measuring pollutant concentrations, relating these to physical crop damages, and estimating the reactions of the agricultural sector and consumers to give welfare changes in terms of consumers' surplus and producers' quasi-rents. The approach of the European open-top chamber programme (EOTCP) is shown to have neglected lessons learnt by the National Crop Loss Assessment Network (NCLAN) in the US

show abstract