22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (Aina 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/aina.2008.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Distributed Coordination Protocol for Multiple Peer Processes

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss a fully distributed unstructured P2P system where there is no centralized coordinator. Each process makes by itself a decision on an agreement value to realize some objectives by communicating with other processes in a group. Each process first takes a value v in a domain D i which is a collection of possible values and notifies the other processes of the value v. A process in turn receives values from other processes. Unless a set of the values satisfy an agreement condition, a proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous works [20,21], we mainly discuss how to reliably deliver messages in a group of multiple peers after the group has been established. A group is constructed in a way that first neighbors, i.e.…”
Section: Basic Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous works [20,21], we mainly discuss how to reliably deliver messages in a group of multiple peers after the group has been established. A group is constructed in a way that first neighbors, i.e.…”
Section: Basic Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many discussions on how to make an agreement on one value out of values shown by the peers in presence of types of faults [11,13,14,8]. The authors [2,3,4,20] discuss types of precedent relations on values to show what value a peer can take after a value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the agreement protocol, it is significant for each peer to decide on which value to show to the other peers if there are multiple possible values. The authors [4] discuss the coordination strategies, forward, backward, mining, and observation strategies to efficiently make an agreement at each round. Some combinations of strategies taken by peers are inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some combinations of strategies taken by peers are inconsistent. We define what combinations of strategies are consistent, and discuss how the peers resolve the inconsistency of the strategies and take consistent strategies [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%