1958
DOI: 10.2307/1929961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Disjunct Stand of Hemlock in the Georgia Piedmont

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seepage slopes tend to occur farther below summits than do outcrops without seepage ( x = 103 m below summit vs. 38 m below summit for non-seepage slopes); p < 0.0001 by t-tests). Seepage presence relates to rock permeability, the strike and dip of metamorphic foliation or outcrop fractures, and topographic influences on sub-surface flow (Boorman & Platt 1958;Schafale & Weakley 1990). Ground water tends to follow rock formations on mountain slopes and moist habitats often develop on and near downslope outcrops (Hursh & Haasis 1931).…”
Section: Rare Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seepage slopes tend to occur farther below summits than do outcrops without seepage ( x = 103 m below summit vs. 38 m below summit for non-seepage slopes); p < 0.0001 by t-tests). Seepage presence relates to rock permeability, the strike and dip of metamorphic foliation or outcrop fractures, and topographic influences on sub-surface flow (Boorman & Platt 1958;Schafale & Weakley 1990). Ground water tends to follow rock formations on mountain slopes and moist habitats often develop on and near downslope outcrops (Hursh & Haasis 1931).…”
Section: Rare Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the species is rather widespread, stand characteristics differ throughout its distribution (Ellison et al 2005). Disjunct stands are common in the southern and western portions of its range and stand characteristics and abiotic conditions of some isolated stands have been studied (Segars et al 1951;Harper 1952;Oosting and Hess 1956;Bormann and Platt 1958). The southern range limit of the species is represented by disjunct stands that are separated from the contiguous range by ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does occur in a few relict stands on the Piedmont, but almost always on protected, moist, north-facing slopes (Bormann andPlatt 1958, Oosting andHess 1956, Segars, Crawford, andHarvill). Tsuga canadensis is not a common plant on the Piedmont today, but in the Southeast is largely confined to rich, cool habitats in the mountainous area.…”
Section: Discussion Locality Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsuga canadensis is not a common plant on the Piedmont today, but in the Southeast is largely confined to rich, cool habitats in the mountainous area. It does occur in a few relict stands on the Piedmont, but almost always on protected, moist, north-facing slopes (Bormann andPlatt 1958, Oosting andHess 1956, Segars, Crawford, andHarvill). These disjunct stands are often interpreted as representing remnants of a formerly more extensive distribution, perhaps developed during glacial periods.…”
Section: Discussion Locality Nomentioning
confidence: 99%