2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discussion on the innovation distribution of the Markov regime-switching GARCH model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidolin, 2011), allowing for fat-tailed innovations can improve both in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting performance of MS GARCH models, as pointed out, e.g. by Ardia (2009), Klaassen (2002), and Shi and Feng (2016). Due to the dependence structure implied by the multivariate t distribution, this also holds for Pelletier's (2006) model where volatility is regime-independent; see Section 4 for a detailed discussion and illustration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Guidolin, 2011), allowing for fat-tailed innovations can improve both in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting performance of MS GARCH models, as pointed out, e.g. by Ardia (2009), Klaassen (2002), and Shi and Feng (2016). Due to the dependence structure implied by the multivariate t distribution, this also holds for Pelletier's (2006) model where volatility is regime-independent; see Section 4 for a detailed discussion and illustration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, in relation to the first point, the robust methodology may improve the reliability of a fitted structural‐change model. For instance, using a Markov‐switching‐type (MS) model, Shi and Feng (2016) demonstrate that even the popular quasimaximum likelihood estimator is not consistent, if tail events (outliers) do exist in the data set. Haas and Paolella (2012) suggest that this may be caused by the fact that the assumed Gaussian distribution cannot accommodate such extreme observations, within an MS‐type model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major problem of the standard GARCH model is that it assumes that the conditional volatility follows only one regime over the entire period (Shi & Feng, 2016). To solve this Hamilton (1985Hamilton ( , 1989) proposed Markov Regime-Switching (MRS) models to allow for parameters to transit between state spaces.…”
Section: Public Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this Hamilton (1985Hamilton ( , 1989) proposed Markov Regime-Switching (MRS) models to allow for parameters to transit between state spaces. Recently, many studies have incorporated MRS specification into GARCH framework known as MRS-GARCH models (e.g., Gao et al, 2018;Naeem et al, 2019;Shi & Feng, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019;Zolfaghari & Sahabi, 2017). These models have been extensively examined on stock markets (e.g., Abounoori et al, 2016;Shi & Feng, 2016;Zhipeng & Shenghong, 2018).…”
Section: Public Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%