A disconnect between staff and student perceptions of learning: an ACELL educational analysis of the first year undergraduate chemistry experiment ‘investigating sugar using a home made polarimeter’

Abstract

This paper describes an educational analysis of a first year university chemistry practical called 'Investigating sugar using a home made polarimeter'. The analysis follows the formalism of the Advancing Chemistry by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory (ACELL) project, which includes a statement of education objectives, and an analysis of the student learning experience. The practical requires students to accurately prepare solutions of known concentrations of a common consumer chemical (sucrose), and then investigate the interaction between these solutions and plane-polarised light. The instrument used is a ''home built'' polarimeter which students assemble, allowing them to recognise that scientific apparatus need not be mysterious in its operation or construction. Student feedback data were conducted using the ACELL Student Learning Experience (ASLE) instrument. Analysis of the data shows that overwhelmingly students rate the experiment as ''worthwhile'' or better. However, many also rate the experiment as ''boring'' or ''uninteresting''. By contrast, staff and student feedback at an ACELL experiential workshop rated the experiment very highly in terms of the ''interest'' criterion. In this contribution we discuss this alignment of staff and student perceptions of various elements, including ''interest'' and explore the correlation with the overall laboratory experience.

University chemistry students' learning approaches and willingness to change major

“…Schmid et al, 2012, for a short review). However, in many cases, these descriptors provide fruitful information or even reveal facts obscured by the formally allowed descriptors (Crisp et al, 2011). Therefore, this approach was also adopted in the present work.…”

Student Perceptions of Chemistry Experiments with Different Technological Interfaces: A Comparative Study

“…Mean values of response scores received from each student cohort, from each year, for each experiment, for each Likert-type response format item on the surveys were calculated for the purposes of comparison (labeled as m 2011 and, m 2012 for mean values from 2011 and 2012 data, respectively). This is in line with both standard methodology of the ASELL project ,,, and recommendations from statistics literature . Mean scored responses to the Likert-type response format items were compared between years for each of the three experiments using the t test for unequal variances, , using this test in preference to the equal variances test in all cases as recommended in the statistics literature for data sets of unequal sample size. , The value of alpha (α) was selected to be 0.05 for the purposes of statistical testing, and two tailed probability values were obtained for all comparisons made.…”

Review of Hands-On Laboratory Experiments Employing Household Supplies

“…45 Most students were highly motivated to construct their own apparatus and put a lot of effort in order to get the best possible results. 23,65 In several instances, students showed a strong interest in conducting their own at-home experiments 38,41,45,53,63 and developed creative solutions in different practical issues. 45 Furthermore, students showed confidence and ability, as they spontaneously shared their instruments in The article can also be implemented to the microfluids topic.…”