2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proposed model, we have utilized the IVHF-Euclidean distance and IVHF-Hamming distance measures because of more attention in the related literature along with ease of interpretation and simplicity in decisionmaking modeling (e.g., [3,8]. In addition, the normalization method presented in definition 6 has been utilized in the proposed new IVHF-MCWR model because it has been easy to use and widely applied in the related literature (e.g., [7,22].…”
Section: Proposed New Ivhf-mcwr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed model, we have utilized the IVHF-Euclidean distance and IVHF-Hamming distance measures because of more attention in the related literature along with ease of interpretation and simplicity in decisionmaking modeling (e.g., [3,8]. In addition, the normalization method presented in definition 6 has been utilized in the proposed new IVHF-MCWR model because it has been easy to use and widely applied in the related literature (e.g., [7,22].…”
Section: Proposed New Ivhf-mcwr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsurprisingly, many scholar generalised the TOPSIS to make it deal with interval numbers (Dymova et al, 2013;Jahanshahloo et al, 2009;Yue, 2011), fuzzy data (Chen, 2000;Krohling and Campanharo, 2011;Lee et al, 2014) intuitionistic fuzzy information (Boran et al, 2009), probability distribution values (Lourenzutti and Krohling, 2014;Xiong and Qi, 2010) and hesitant fuzzy inputs (Xu and Zhang, 2013). Though various generalisations were proposed, methods to deal with heterogeneous information in TOPSIS were limited.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TOPSIS method makes full use of the index data information analyses of the differences between the cities and calculates the distance between the measurement targets for the optimal solution and the worst solution. From this final analysis, the relative degree between the city's development level and the optimal solution can be determined [30][31][32]. This method has the advantage of being real, intuitive, and reliable as there are special requirements for the samples.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%