A digital evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog

Abstract

The contour augmentation performed with DBBM particles and a collagen membrane at the buccal aspects of implants placed IPIES was not able to maintain the tissue volume.

Healing of Bio‐Oss® grafted marginal gaps at implants placed into fresh extraction sockets of incisor teeth in dogs: a study on the effect of submerged vs. non‐submerged healing

“…; Favero et al. ,b,c) showing that horizontal resorption will occur despite grafting of extraction sockets or the peri‐implant defects. However, it should be noted that here, we compared the baseline measurements, which were recorded using a periodontal probe, to histometric measurements.…”

Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post‐extraction in esthetic sites

“…The assessment of the facial bone wall thickness provides the clinician with a prognostic tool to estimate the degree of future bone loss prior to tooth extraction. It is important to note that dimensional bone alterations observed in patients are 2–3.5 times more severe than those seen in experimental studies . Post‐extraction bone modeling in single‐tooth extraction sites seems to be localized to the central, mid‐facial aspect of the socket wall at 8 weeks post‐extraction, while proximal areas are well supported by the periodontal ligament (PDL) of the neighboring teeth and show no bone loss .…”

An open randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate ridge preservation and repair using SocketKAP™ and SocketKAGE™: part 2 – three‐dimensional alveolar bone volumetric analysis of CBCT imaging

“…; Favero et al. ). Alveolar bone resorption following tooth extraction, well documented in canine models, appears to be initiated within the first weeks and is localized primarily to the facial (Araujo & Lindhe ).…”

“…; Favero et al. ) and non‐resorbable (Lekovic et al. ) membranes, as well as autogenous soft tissue plugs (Jung et al.…”