2015
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate ridge preservation and repair using SocketKAP and SocketKAGE: part 2 – three‐dimensional alveolar bone volumetric analysis of CBCT imaging

Abstract: SocketKAP(™) , with ABBM, appears effective in limiting post-extraction volumetric bone loss in intact sockets, while SocketKAP(™) + SocketKAGE + ABBM appears effective in limiting post-extraction bone loss in sockets with dehiscence defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant 3D volumetric bone loss of about 35% occurred in the non‐grafted sockets. In agreement with previous studies on non‐grafted sockets with buccal dehiscence defects (Abdelhamid et al., ; Crespi et al., ), bone loss occurred primarily in the 0‐3 mm zone apical to the alveolar crest (from 29% to 43%). Conversely, the augmented sockets exhibited a volume deficiency of about 9% with respect to the maximum volume for regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant 3D volumetric bone loss of about 35% occurred in the non‐grafted sockets. In agreement with previous studies on non‐grafted sockets with buccal dehiscence defects (Abdelhamid et al., ; Crespi et al., ), bone loss occurred primarily in the 0‐3 mm zone apical to the alveolar crest (from 29% to 43%). Conversely, the augmented sockets exhibited a volume deficiency of about 9% with respect to the maximum volume for regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Importantly, the baseline CBCT images were taken immediately after tooth removal. This eliminated the need of digital subtraction of pre‐extraction target teeth, as reported in previous studies (Abdelhamid, Omran, Bakhshalian, Tarnow, & Zadeh, ; Crespi et al., ; Sbordone et al., ), and had the advantage to avoid the superimposition of bone and dental tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a recent review, Benic et al (13) stated that in ethically approved clinical research, three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography or cone beam computed tomography) can be used pre-and postoperatively to evaluate bone and soft tissues, as well as the implant position, with reference to the anatomic structures. Cone beam computed tomography imaging is increasingly being used for three-dimensional assessment of bone following ridge preservation (1,7,94), sinus floor elevation (53,93,106,143) and implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation (23,31,77,83) or staged procedures following block grafts (97,98,129). Besides visualization of bony structures, cone beam computed tomography is also used to assess the contour and dimension of the periimplant mucosa (11,78).…”
Section: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging For Clinical Research mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microtitanium stent, even with its distortion, is acceptable in preserving the alveolar ridge, yet the stent fails to act as a barrier membrane [ 13 ]. SocketKAP™ and SocketKAGE™ prefabricated devices have also been studied for their effectiveness in ridge preservation [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%