A ‘Different Class’? Homophily and Heterophily in the Social Class Networks of Britpop

Abstract

Social network analysis is increasingly recognised as a useful way to explore music scenes. In this article we examine the individuals who were the cultural workforce that comprised the ‘Britpop’ music scene of the 1990s. The focus of our analysis is homophily and heterophily to determine whether the clusters of friendships and working relationships of those who were ‘best connected’ in the scene were patterned by original social class position. We find that Britpop’s ‘whole network’ is heterophilic but that its ‘sub-networks’ are more likely to be social class homophilic. The sub-networks that remain heterophilic are likely to be united by other common experiences that brought individuals in the network to the same social spaces. We suggest that our findings on Britpop might be generalised to the composition of other music scenes, cultural workforces and aggregations of young people. Our study differs from research on, first, British ‘indie music’ and social class which focuses upon the construction, representation and performance of social location rather than the relationships it might shape and second, the pioneering social network analyses of music scenes which currently lack explicit emphasis on social class.

Music Performance Attendance and Happiness

“…Therefore, the hypothesis was rejected. What this says about my literature is that said findings are consistent with the literature (Alderson and Katz-Gerro 2016;Ball and Chernova 2008;Easterlin 1995;Michalos 2004;Millward, Widdop, and Halpin 2017).…”

“…Lastly, collective effervescence is a theory that has been studied by social scientists and psychologists alike. Torres, Moreira, and Lopes 2018 Next, the principle of homophily asserts that, essentially, "birds of feather flock together" (Mark 1998;Mark 2003;Millward, Widdop, and Halpin 2017;Zhou, Xu, and Zhao 2018). This concept will be-for the purposes of this study-examined through a cultural lens.…”

The Hipster Paradox in Electronic Dance Music: How Musicians Trade Mainstream Success off against Alternative Status

“…Music involves a series of relations between a variety of agents such as artists, mentors, recording studios, labels, distributing companies, promoters, music venues, audiences, and critics (Small 1999). A number of studies uses networks to explore music fields and musicians' careers (Allington, Dueck, and Jordanous 2015;Crossley 2020;Emms and Crossley 2018;Millward, Widdop, and Halpin 2017).…”

Translocality, Network Structure, and Music Worlds: Underground Metal in the United Kingdom

“…Use of SNA in music sociology is increasing, with fascinating results (Allington et al ; Crossley ; Crossley and Emms ; Crossley et al. ; McAndrew and Everett ; Millward et al ). Studies to date have tended to focus upon local and virtual worlds, however.…”

“…IN THIS PAPER, we use formal social network analysis (SNA) to explore the network structure of the U.K.'s translocal underground heavy metal music world (UMW). This is intended as a contribution both to current debates on “music worlds” and also to the emerging literature on musical networks and the potential of SNA for their analysis (Allington, Dueck, and Jordanous ; Becker , , ; Crossley , ; Crossley and Bottero ; Crossley and Emms ; Crossley, McAndrews, and Widdop ; Finnegan ; Gilmore , ; Lopes ; Martin , ; McAndrew and Everett ; Millward, Widdop, and Halpin ). The paper forms part of a larger project being conducted by the first‐named author, which employs a mixed‐method approach to investigate various aspects of the UMW, combining a questionnaire survey of participation patterns among 474 insiders with ethnographic observation and 29 qualitative interviews with occupants of a variety of roles within this music world (Emms ).…”