1980
DOI: 10.1139/z80-168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A device for observing wild beavers in their lodge

Abstract: A device is described that allows direct visual observation of wild beavers within their original lodges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beavers (Castor canadensis) are colonial mammals that live in lodges or bank dens (Baker and Hill 2003), making them a useful species for application of remote videography to record behavior and demographic characteristics. Previous methods of recording beaver behavior inside beaver lodges have included audio-taping and direct observation (Tevis 1950, Potvin and Bovet 1975, Oertli 1976, Patenaude-Pilote et al 1980). However, audio-taping and direct observations have drawbacks, such as being labor-intensive and disruptive to animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beavers (Castor canadensis) are colonial mammals that live in lodges or bank dens (Baker and Hill 2003), making them a useful species for application of remote videography to record behavior and demographic characteristics. Previous methods of recording beaver behavior inside beaver lodges have included audio-taping and direct observation (Tevis 1950, Potvin and Bovet 1975, Oertli 1976, Patenaude-Pilote et al 1980). However, audio-taping and direct observations have drawbacks, such as being labor-intensive and disruptive to animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed readers are comparable to filming within lodges, as both methods identify individuals within a family‐group at a fixed position (Patenaude‐Pilote et al 1980, Bloomquist and Nielsen 2009, Mott et al 2011). However, unlike direct observation or video identification inside lodges using external ear and tail markers, fixed readers can provide a definite identification of each animal recorded, with no possibility of observer error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods used to monitor the number of animals in a family‐group often rely on capture‐mark‐recapture studies (Rosell and Hovde 2001, Campbell et al 2012, White et al 2015, Graf et al 2016, Mayer et al 2017). Noninvasive studies use direct observation (Rosell and Nolet 1997; Rosell et al 1998, 2006), camera traps (Severud et al 2011), and filming within lodges (Patenaude‐Pilote et al 1980, Bloomquist and Nielsen 2009, Mott et al 2011). However, drawbacks to these methods highlight the potential of RFID for the noninvasive monitoring of animals in a family‐group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%