1965
DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1965.10532773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Developmental Study of Word Definitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
5

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although definitions have been used to investigate semantic and conceptual development (Anglin 1977, Inhelder & Piaget 1964, Litowitz 1977, Nelson 1978, Norlin 1980, Vygotsky 1962, Wolman & Barker 1969, vocabulary development and intellectual functioning (Binet & Simon 1916, Feifel & Lorge 1950, Wechsler 1974 they have sometimes had an ambiguous status as data on semantic development and language development in general. The ambiguity derives in part from the uncertain relation between what someone says a word means and what it actually means to them, as inferred from their use of the word or their judgements about the use of the word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although definitions have been used to investigate semantic and conceptual development (Anglin 1977, Inhelder & Piaget 1964, Litowitz 1977, Nelson 1978, Norlin 1980, Vygotsky 1962, Wolman & Barker 1969, vocabulary development and intellectual functioning (Binet & Simon 1916, Feifel & Lorge 1950, Wechsler 1974 they have sometimes had an ambiguous status as data on semantic development and language development in general. The ambiguity derives in part from the uncertain relation between what someone says a word means and what it actually means to them, as inferred from their use of the word or their judgements about the use of the word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on word definitions focused on the cognitive aspect of worddefinition performance (Al-Issa, 1969;Feifel, 1949;Feilfel & Lorge, 1950;Reichard, Schneider, & Rapaport, 1944;Storck & Looft, 1973;Swartz & Hall, 1972;Terman, 1916;Wolman & Barker, 1965) and have concluded that the development of children's ability to give word definitions is a gradual process from the infantile (functional) type, characteristic of younger children or schizophrenic adults (Feifel, 1949) towards the more mature (superordinate) type that is attributed to children about or older than age 10 and normal adults.…”
Section: Previous Studies That Used Word-definition Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a number of coding systems have been employed to help researchers analyze the word-definition data. Some of these coding systems used semantic analyses of the data (Al-Issa, 1969;Feifel, 1949;Reichard, Storck & Looft, 1973;Wolman & Barker, 1965), while others applied both semantic and syntactic criteria (Litowitz, 1977;Watson, 1985). The analysis most relevant to the nature of this study is the one suggested by Watson. According to Watson (1985), the most common types of definitions children give can be categorized semantically and syntactically into four groups: a) Functional (NP1 VERB) -e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the literature recognizes developmental shifts both in cognition (Piaget & Inhelder 1969, White 1965 and in verbal definitions (Wolman & Barker 1965, Al-Issa 1969, subjects were divided into two age groups: younger (3 to 7 years) and older (8 to 12 years). The first concerns the nature of children's semantic knowledge: specifically, whether the part-whole semantic relation is available to children, as judged by their willingness to express it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%