Frontiers in Electronic Testing 2002
DOI: 10.1007/b117480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Designer’s Guide to Built-In Self-Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue disclosed in Example 1 can be formulated in a more general way; i.e., a low phase shift between test bit sequences appearing at neighboring outputs of a pseudo-random TPG leads to a strong correlation between test vectors supplied to scan paths fed from these outputs. It is why these vectors may no longer be considered as pseudo-random ones, which adversely affects the fault coverage in digital CUTs with the STUMPS-type LBIST architecture [3] (pp. 177-181), [12,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The issue disclosed in Example 1 can be formulated in a more general way; i.e., a low phase shift between test bit sequences appearing at neighboring outputs of a pseudo-random TPG leads to a strong correlation between test vectors supplied to scan paths fed from these outputs. It is why these vectors may no longer be considered as pseudo-random ones, which adversely affects the fault coverage in digital CUTs with the STUMPS-type LBIST architecture [3] (pp. 177-181), [12,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very popular LBIST architecture operated in the test-per-scan mode is STUMPS (Self-Test Using MISR/Parallel Shift register sequence generator) [1], [2] (pp. 288-290), [3] (pp. 176-177), [4] (pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations