2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-015-9417-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A design science research methodology for developing a computer-aided assessment approach using method marking concept

Abstract: Assessment has been defined as an authentic method that plays an important role in evaluating students' learning attitude in acquiring lifelong knowledge. Traditional methods of assessment including the Computer-Aided Assessment (CAA) for mathematics show limited ability to assess students' full work unless multi-step questions are sub-divided into sub questions. This issue persisted significant drawback especially within the notion of method marking approach. To address this issue, the aim of the study is to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DBR is considered a DSR realization in the education sector to conduct research to develop and evaluate an BDAS as an IT and DSR artefact. DSR complements DBR and provides multi-paradigm perspectives to construct fundamental knowledge by researching social pragmatisms (30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Integrated Design Science Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBR is considered a DSR realization in the education sector to conduct research to develop and evaluate an BDAS as an IT and DSR artefact. DSR complements DBR and provides multi-paradigm perspectives to construct fundamental knowledge by researching social pragmatisms (30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Integrated Design Science Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the need to ask questions that can be marked by computer leads to reduction in validity, as this tends to focus questions on procedural aspects (Broughton, Hernandez-Martinez and Robinson, 2017). The final answer input into a computer is not necessarily enough to establish partial credit (Rønning, 2017), a normal part of assessment in mathematics (Genemo, Miah & McAndrew, 2016), leading to a solution with a minor error potentially being marked as completely wrong (Greenhow, 2015). Some systems attempt to address this by breaking questions into parts, steps or sub-questions, prioritising procedural aspects and so reducing validity (Quinney, 2010).…”
Section: Summative Assessment: Validity Reliability and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the problem of assessing the students' full workings, while evaluating MSQs using CAA for Mathematics, can be classified as a wicked problem. In MMC, a student's ability to produce a final result can be determined by assessing the sequence of steps used to produce the steps and final answers (Genemo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Issues Of Assessing Multi-step Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%