2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60068-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Design Method for Product Family under Manufacturing Resource Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to formulate the product family, a similarity index could be established to measure the similarity between different products. Kimura and Nielsen [56] developed a framework for the relationship between product functionality and manufacturing resources. Their framework yields to a design method for product family structure, which realizes the required product functional variety with efficient utilization of manufacturing resources.…”
Section: Formulating a Product Family By Utilizing Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to formulate the product family, a similarity index could be established to measure the similarity between different products. Kimura and Nielsen [56] developed a framework for the relationship between product functionality and manufacturing resources. Their framework yields to a design method for product family structure, which realizes the required product functional variety with efficient utilization of manufacturing resources.…”
Section: Formulating a Product Family By Utilizing Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product family assembly line planning must be able to rapidly and efficiently respond to the dynamic evolution of product family such as adding, removing, and upgrading modules and changes of various planning elements such as cost and new technology introduction and fully consider the influence of dynamic quantity change of variant products, task addition or removal, operation time variation, and different solutions of module partition on task assignment and assembly line balancing schemes. In all, product family assembly line must realize balancing in the coevolution process with product family; namely, evolution balancing as shown in Figure 2, share assembly resources between product variants and even generational products to the greatest extent and provide high quality and low cost individualized products in the shortest possible time and reduce the adjustment costs of assembly line [23,24].…”
Section: Evolution Balancing Process Of Pfal For Swlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line layout is shown in Fig. 3 and the task assignments are [ (1,2,4), (3,5), (6,7,8), (9,10,11)]. 3.2 Generation 2 product family and assembly system Two new modules, M12 and M13, are introduced in the second generation (Gen 2).…”
Section: Generation 1 Product Family and Assembly Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When products change from one generation to another, new assembly systems must be simultaneously designed. Some researchers have previously recognized a need for product evolution or co-evolution [7][8][9][10][11]. However, systematic methods for such co-evolution have not been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%