1963
DOI: 10.1099/0096266x-13-3-133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A description of the type strain of Pseudomonas maltophilia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

1966
1966
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The oxidase reaction is positive for every species that we have examined except Pseudomonas maltophilia, which was also reported by Thibault (1961) and by Hugh & Leifson (1963) to be oxidase negative. The biochemical basis of the differences between aerobic bacteria in their response to this commonly used diagnostic test is not known.…”
Section: The Oxidase Reaction and Its Relation To The Cytochrome Systemmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oxidase reaction is positive for every species that we have examined except Pseudomonas maltophilia, which was also reported by Thibault (1961) and by Hugh & Leifson (1963) to be oxidase negative. The biochemical basis of the differences between aerobic bacteria in their response to this commonly used diagnostic test is not known.…”
Section: The Oxidase Reaction and Its Relation To The Cytochrome Systemmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Strain 72 is aberrant : it can grow a t the expense of D-xylose, isobutyrate, ethanol, n-propanol and L-aspartate, but not on malonate. The type strain of the species, which was proposed by Hugh & Leifson (1963) Pherw typic comparison betweelk Pseudomonas maktophilia and other species of aerobic pseudomonads. The ideal phenotype of P. maltophilia, defined on the basis of a total of ten selected characters, is shown in Table 59.…”
Section: General Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an example of such an MDRO that causes respiratory infections in patients, particularly tiantibiotic resistance and provides a comparison of clinical and environmental S. maltophilia isolates. (154); later, rRNA cistron analysis determined that it was more appropriately named Xanthomonas maltophilia (259,260,325). In a large study of Xanthomonas strains, an analysis of 295 phenotypic characteristics resulted in 7 strains being identified as X. maltophilia, with 2 of these 7 being type strains of Pseudomonas betle and Pseudomonas hibiscicola (341).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We isolated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain WR-C from a clogged septic tank system that consistently formed biofilms on sand grains, produced exopolysaccharides (EPS), and caused clogging in sand columns (33). S. maltophilia is a gram-negative, rod-shaped, and obligate aerobic bacterium with polar flagella in the ␥-␤ subdivision of Proteobacteria (3,14). It is found in various environments and recently has emerged as an important human pathogen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%