1968
DOI: 10.2307/1378743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Description of the Baculum and Os Clitoris of Eutamias townsendii ochrogenys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for ontogenetic variation, specimens were classified into three age categories (juveniles, subadults, and adults) based on patterns of maxillary dentition (Beg and Hoffman 1977). Subadults and adults were pooled in morphometric analyses because the baculum has been repeatedly shown to obtain adult dimensions relatively early in development (White 1953;Adams and Sutton 1968;Beg and Hoffman 1977). Juveniles and specimens of unknown age (skull damaged or absent) were examined for classification purposes only (n ϭ 29, see below).…”
Section: Morphometric Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To account for ontogenetic variation, specimens were classified into three age categories (juveniles, subadults, and adults) based on patterns of maxillary dentition (Beg and Hoffman 1977). Subadults and adults were pooled in morphometric analyses because the baculum has been repeatedly shown to obtain adult dimensions relatively early in development (White 1953;Adams and Sutton 1968;Beg and Hoffman 1977). Juveniles and specimens of unknown age (skull damaged or absent) were examined for classification purposes only (n ϭ 29, see below).…”
Section: Morphometric Data Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the evolutionary processes driving differentiation of animal genitalia remains controversial and several viable alternatives to the lock-and-key interpretation exist (for reviews, see Eberhard 1985;Arnqvist 1997). In Tamias, a lock-and-key explanation of bacular divergence is based on the protrusion of the baculum from the glans during copulation (Adams and Sutton 1968) and subsequent potential to perform a species-specific reproductive function (Patterson and Thaeler 1982). The extent to which bacular differentiation in Tamias results in, or is predictive of, reproductive isolation has never been directly addressed.…”
Section: Evolutionary Implications Of Asymmetric Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams and Sutton (1968) concluded that N. townsendii ochrogenys had a baculum distinct from that of N. townsendii and suggested that this distinction warranted species differentiation. Sutton and Nadler (1974) analyzed bacular morphology of three subspecies of N.…”
Section: Generic Debates the Geographic Distribution Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the evolutionary processes driving differentiation of animal genitalia remains controversial and several viable alternatives to the lock-and-key interpretation exist (for reviews, see Eberhard 1985;Arnqvist 1997). In Tamias, a lock-and-key explanation of bacular divergence is based on the protrusion of the baculum from the glans during copulation (Adams and Sutton 1968) and subsequent potential to perform a species-specific reproductive function (Patterson and Thaeler 1982). The extent to which bacular differentiation in Tamias results in, or is predictive of, reproductive isolation has never been directly addressed.…”
Section: Evolutionary Implications Of Asymmetric Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%