2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2000000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A (des)informação sobre medicamentos: o duplo padrão de conduta das empresas farmacêuticas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
22

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worthy to consider that the content of these materials is provided to their editors by the pharmaceutical companies themselves. Barros (2000) developed a comparative study between the information contained at Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), corresponding to Brazilian DEF, and Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (USP-DI), both from United States, with those presented, for the same products, in the Brazilian compendium. The data analysis has pointed to deficiencies of qualitative and quantitative order in the information available at DEF, reinforcing the idea that pharmaceutical specialties compendiums should not be The results obtained are in accordance with similar studies developed at Southeastern Michigan, in Québec, in Hong Kong, in Galicia and in Switzerland, in which the most mentioned publication was also a pharmaceutical specialties compendium (Poirier, Ascione, 1980;Mailhot, Giacona-Dahl, 1987;Chan, Lee, Critchley, 1996;Loza Garcia et al, 2000;Zehnder et al, 2004).…”
Section: Books and Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthy to consider that the content of these materials is provided to their editors by the pharmaceutical companies themselves. Barros (2000) developed a comparative study between the information contained at Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), corresponding to Brazilian DEF, and Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (USP-DI), both from United States, with those presented, for the same products, in the Brazilian compendium. The data analysis has pointed to deficiencies of qualitative and quantitative order in the information available at DEF, reinforcing the idea that pharmaceutical specialties compendiums should not be The results obtained are in accordance with similar studies developed at Southeastern Michigan, in Québec, in Hong Kong, in Galicia and in Switzerland, in which the most mentioned publication was also a pharmaceutical specialties compendium (Poirier, Ascione, 1980;Mailhot, Giacona-Dahl, 1987;Chan, Lee, Critchley, 1996;Loza Garcia et al, 2000;Zehnder et al, 2004).…”
Section: Books and Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Studies analyzing and comparing the directions and compendia for medications in developed and developing countries have identified differing patterns of information for the same drug from the same multinational. 4,13,14 Although such differences have been observed with regard to directions and compendia, little has been said about the differences in information regarding drug advertising, especially in Brazil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta não é uma situação isolada, pois estudos realizados por Auricchio, Batistic-Longatto e Nicoletti (2007), Balbani, Stelzer e Montovani (2006) e Barros (2000), demonstraram que as informações veiculadas em rótulos, bulas e no DEF apresentaram sérias deficiências. Isso explica a necessidade de utilização dos sites da ANVISA e dos laboratórios produtores dos medicamentos para obtenção, entre outras, de informações sobre a composição dos produtos.…”
Section: Outras Considerações Importantesunclassified