2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0425-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deletion mutation in TaHRC confers Fhb1 resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
214
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
214
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Qfhs.nau-6B (Fhb2), Qfhi.nau-4B (Fhb4), and Qfhi.nau-5A (Fhb5) were fine mapped in the 2.2 cM, 0.14 cM, and 0.09 cM interval [16]. Fhb1 has been cloned recently [18][19][20]. In current study, four loci (28 MTAs) were identified on chromosomes 1B, 4A, 5D and 7A in two seasons.…”
Section: Fhb Resistance Loci Identified By Gwasmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Qfhs.nau-6B (Fhb2), Qfhi.nau-4B (Fhb4), and Qfhi.nau-5A (Fhb5) were fine mapped in the 2.2 cM, 0.14 cM, and 0.09 cM interval [16]. Fhb1 has been cloned recently [18][19][20]. In current study, four loci (28 MTAs) were identified on chromosomes 1B, 4A, 5D and 7A in two seasons.…”
Section: Fhb Resistance Loci Identified By Gwasmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Twenty-eight MTAs located on chromosomes 1B (1), 4A (7), 5D (19) and 7A (1) were consistently identified in both seasons and could be considered as stable QTL (Table 1), SNP GENE-0293_154 located on 1B explained 6.91-7.18% of phenotypic variances (R 2 ). Seven and 19 SNPs located on 4AL and 5DL chromosomes explained phenotypic variances (R 2 ) ranging from 9.36-11.63% and 8.11-14.18%, respectively.…”
Section: Marker-trait Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rawat et al (2016) that mutation of the histidine-rich calcium-binding protein as the gene responsible for 424 Fhb1 resistance. However, in conflict with the findings of Su et al (2019), their data 425 suggests that this is due to a gain-of-function resulting from an different start codon 426 positioned upstream to the original (Li et al, 2019). Our data on the 3HS-3BL centric 427 fusion line does not suggest that 3BS contains a susceptibility factor, as the line was 428 either wild type-like or more highly susceptible to the spread of FHB.…”
Section: Discussion 294mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although the gene(s) underlying Fhb1, the most widely deployed FHB resistance 61 QTL, remains controversial, there is evidence that Fhb1 may be considered a 62 disrupted susceptibility factor (Su et al, 2019;Su et al, 2018). Plant hormones play 63 an important role in responding to disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%