2023
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Pipeline Using Prior Knowledge for Automatic Evaluation of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders With MRI

Abstract: BackgroundThe diagnosis of prenatal placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly dependent on radiologists' experience. A deep learning (DL) method using the prior knowledge that PAS‐related signs are generally found along the utero‐placental borderline (UPB) may help radiologists, especially those with less experience, to mitigate this issue.PurposeTo develop a DL tool for antenatal diagnosis of PAS using T2‐weighted MR images.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsFive hundred and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subgroup analysis based on different dataset types revealed higher accuracy in internal validation datasets compared to combined internal and external validation datasets. In studies by Peng and Wang, 2 centers were utilized, with one collecting data for training and internal validation, and the other for external validation [ 14 , 15 ]. Internal validation, being based on the model development cohort data, typically serves as a component of model development, while external validation involves assessing the model’s performance in new data, resulting in lower sensitivity and DOR for this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgroup analysis based on different dataset types revealed higher accuracy in internal validation datasets compared to combined internal and external validation datasets. In studies by Peng and Wang, 2 centers were utilized, with one collecting data for training and internal validation, and the other for external validation [ 14 , 15 ]. Internal validation, being based on the model development cohort data, typically serves as a component of model development, while external validation involves assessing the model’s performance in new data, resulting in lower sensitivity and DOR for this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that physicians make decisions by integrating various data in the patient, such a multimodal model could improve the prediction performance. In the field of placentas, a few studies using deep learning have been published [9][10][11] . Romeo et al reported a prediction model that predict placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%