2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2018.2864158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Evaluator for Image Retargeting Quality by Geometrical and Contextual Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. In particular, sub-figure 9 (1) describes the recognition of the target; and 9 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) show the reaching process towards the target. The joint angles of the robotic arm were adjusted step by step based on the position errors between the hand and target, and the whole process took 11 steps.…”
Section: B Reaching Movement Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9. In particular, sub-figure 9 (1) describes the recognition of the target; and 9 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) show the reaching process towards the target. The joint angles of the robotic arm were adjusted step by step based on the position errors between the hand and target, and the whole process took 11 steps.…”
Section: B Reaching Movement Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 shows another experiment process, with a different target position closer to the robotic arm. The rough reaching movement and the correction movement are shown in subfigures 11 (2) and 11 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), respectively. In this experiment, the grasper successfully grasped the ball, even though the target was closer to the robotic arm, which made the robotic arm easier to touch the ball and lead to a failure.…”
Section: B Reaching Movement Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional assessments are often designed to evaluate the quality of enhanced images, which has made great achievements. Among these traditional criterions, four metrics are selected here to assess finger-vein image quality: the gradient in spatial domain, the gray contrast, the information capacity, and the deep evaluator based on stacked auto encoder [32].…”
Section: B Performance Metrics For Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DESAE is a image retargeting quality assessment, and it evaluates image quality based on both geometry and content features, which is sensitive to the foundational information in images [32]. It can be computed as,…”
Section: ) Deep Evaluator Based On Stacked Auto Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, feature tracking based on feature detection and matching framework (DMF) [40], [41] have received much attention from the communities of compute vision [42]- [46] and computer graphics [47]. For example, Zhang et al [42] proposed a non-consecutive feature tracking method for SFM-based 3D reconstruction and simultaneous localization and mapping.…”
Section: A Feature Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%