2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decomposition based Multi-Objective Heat Transfer Search algorithm for structure optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit of over-passing wind turbine data is to guarantee the wind turbine will always operate at its actual MPP, regardless of disparities in the blades external characteristics or other influencing parameters. Though the unique characteristics drive HCS to be the optimal selection in MPPT control at various WECS environments; thus is suitable for wind speed conditions that change slowly [7], [45]. Applying large step size perturbations can enhance the convergence speed but at the negative impact of affecting efficiency which is called a trade-off.…”
Section: Development Of Hill Climbing Search Algorithm a Conventional...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of over-passing wind turbine data is to guarantee the wind turbine will always operate at its actual MPP, regardless of disparities in the blades external characteristics or other influencing parameters. Though the unique characteristics drive HCS to be the optimal selection in MPPT control at various WECS environments; thus is suitable for wind speed conditions that change slowly [7], [45]. Applying large step size perturbations can enhance the convergence speed but at the negative impact of affecting efficiency which is called a trade-off.…”
Section: Development Of Hill Climbing Search Algorithm a Conventional...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most real-life issues belong to multi-objective optimization problems rather than a single objective due to having a mutual conflict in the objectives, for example, a minimization of mass may cause conflict with the strength of the structure, a maximization of strength causes a high price, etc. [51][52][53]. A typical multi-objective optimization problem can be formulated as follows:…”
Section: Multi-objective Reliability-based Partial Topology Optimizat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other popular multi-objective (MO) Algorithms include MO ant lion optimizer (MOALO) 43 , MO equilibrium optimizer (MOEO) 44 , MO slime mould algorithm (MOSMA) 45 , MO arithmetic optimization algorithm (MOAOA) 46 , non-dominated sorting ions motion algorithm (NSIMO) 47 , MO marine predator algorithm (MOMPA) 48 , multi-objective multi-verse optimization (MOMVO) 49 , non-dominated sorting grey wolf optimizer (NS-GWO) 50 , MO gradient-based optimizer (MOGBO) 51 , MO plasma generation optimizer (MOPGO) 52 , non-dominated sorting Harris hawks optimization (NSHHO) 53 , MO thermal exchange optimization (MOTEO) 54 , decomposition based multi-objective heat transfer search (MOHTS/D) 55 , Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Symbiotic Organism Search (MOSOS/D) 56 , MOGNDO Algorithm 57 , Non-dominated sorting moth flame optimizer (NSMFO) 58 , Non-dominated sorting whale optimization algorithm (NSWOA) 59 , Non-Dominated Sorting Dragonfly Algorithm (NSDA) 60 , a reference vector based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with Q-learning for operator adaptation 61 , a many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on hybrid dynamic decomposition 62 and use of two penalty values in multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition 63 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%