Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies - 6th International Conference 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044276-1/50104-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decision Support System for Underground CO2 Sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of a linear relation between specific reboiler duty and flue gas CO 2 concentration can be justified for the range of CO 2 concentration considered in this study (3-13 vol%) according to literature (e.g., Alie et al, 2005;Egberts et al, 2003) 5 . The range for reboiler duty is not the lowest reported in the literature for existing solvents.…”
Section: Energy Requirement and Energy Supply Options For Post-combusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The assumption of a linear relation between specific reboiler duty and flue gas CO 2 concentration can be justified for the range of CO 2 concentration considered in this study (3-13 vol%) according to literature (e.g., Alie et al, 2005;Egberts et al, 2003) 5 . The range for reboiler duty is not the lowest reported in the literature for existing solvents.…”
Section: Energy Requirement and Energy Supply Options For Post-combusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For retrofits, however, reboiler duty would be somewhat higher due to limited heat integration. Specific reboiler duty is indicated to be 30% higher for retrofits compared to new plants (Egberts et al, 2003). Taking into account that our study assumes retrofit CO 2 capture, we consider the assumed range for specific reboiler duty to be valid.…”
Section: Energy Requirement and Energy Supply Options For Post-combusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some approaches, although not many, have been made to tackle this problem. Most early trials use a source‐sink matching method, where a carbon dioxide emission source and a sequestration sink are linked by a pipeline. This method aims to minimize the sum of capture cost, sequestration cost, and pipeline cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEA scrubbing) and has the advantage that it can easily be applied as retrofit to existing plants at low technical risk [23]. However, unlike power plants, cement plants have limited low-grade waste heat available for solvent regeneration (typically only up to 30% of the total heat required for regeneration can be supplied by waste heat [24]. Thus, additional steam has to be generated or imported from elsewhere, increasing the cost of capture significantly.…”
Section: Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%