A decision on the truckload and less-than-truckload problem: An approach based on MCDA

Vega, Diego; Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal; Toso, Eli Angela Vitor; Faria, Rosane Nunes de

doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.09.013

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a substantially broad literature on broadening the scope of SWOT-AHP based on sustainable development, economy, industry, supply chain and selection practices in terms of economic and social sustainability (Awasthi et al, 2018 ; Bas, 2013 ; Calabrese et al, 2019 ; Centobelli et al, 2017 ; Dania et al, 2018 ; Govindan et al, 2014 , 2020a , 2020b , 2020c ; Kim & Park, 2019 ; Lenis Escobar et al, 2020 ; Mangla et al, 2018 ; Mani et al, 2014 ; Raza et al, 2018 ; Tavana et al, 2016 ). There have been numerous attempts elaborating on the AHP and SWOT connection within the scope of environmentally sustainable development such as the selection of potential areas and suitable routes in various areas according to geographic features (Coruhlu et al, 2020 ; Datta, 2020 ; De La Vega et al, 2018 ; Kumari & Pandey, 2020 ), sustainable environmental relationship and appropriate agricultural land location selection (Feng, 2020 ; Sarı & Koyuncu, 2021 ), sustainable energy and environmental impact assessment (Anser et al, 2020 ; Ervural et al, 2018 ; Solangi et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), natural resource sustainability (Kajanus et al, 2012 ), sustainable tourism (Asadpourian et al, 2020 ; Fabac & Zver, 2011 ; Kişi, 2019 ; Najafinasab et al, 2020 ; Navarro-Martínez et al, 2020 ; Zorlu & Yılmaz, 2020 ) and residential areas sustainability (Esmaeilzadeh et al, 2020 ; Fatourehchi & Zarghami, 2020 ; Kramar et al, 2019 ). Furthermore, environmental, economic and social sustainability studies regarding national and regional characteristics (Alipouri et al, 2020 ; Calabrese et al, 2019 ; Jayaraman et al, 2015 ; Modibbo et al, 2020 ) related to general issues of sustainable development has narrow literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Kaymaz

Birinci

Kızılkan

2021

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development is one of the issues that many developed and developing countries focus on in the world. The sustainability of human and natural resources is of great importance for securing the world and humanity's common future. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the socio-economic structure of Erzurum with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and digitized strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis considering sustainable development goals (SDGs). The items included in the Agenda 21 report of the United Nations and 17 SDGs determined by the United Nations were taken into consideration in this endeavour. In line with expert opinions, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats created by the sustainable development goals for Erzurum province were analysed statistically with the AHP. Priority and weighted values of each sub-criterion were calculated. According to this analysis, “the richness of natural, cultural and historical resources for tourism potential” ranks first among the strengths of the province regarding sustainable development goals. Weaknesses include “insufficient investment and entrepreneurial culture”. However, “priority region status for development” criterion stands out as the most important opportunity. Threats include “loss of labour force due to migration from agricultural areas” criterion. After the statistical analysis, the quantitative results of made for the best realization of sustainable development for the area were assessed to specify new goals and strategies. Suggestions were offered to define opportunities and strengths, threats and weaknesses with new-build strategies and to make the plans accordingly.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Kaymaz

Birinci

Kızılkan

2021

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other words, in addition to the carriers' opinions, the shippers' perspectives should be considered when judging the appropriateness of freight policies for increasing loads on trucks. Second, at present, transportation studies that explore and analyze the return of empty trucks are mostly dominated by analytical approaches (De La Vega et al , 2018). However, a number of soft factors or human-related issues are explored in the current study using the MEC approach.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring shippers' motivations to adopt collaborative truck-sharing initiatives

Islam

Uddin

Shi

et al. 2021

IJPDLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeA seaport is an essential part of a supply chain, but many ports experience truck shortages, creating pressure for port authorities from shippers who need more trucks that move cargo. This study explores and ranks the motives for adopting a truck-sharing concept (where shippers share the same truck for delivery) as a mechanism to improve transport capacity.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a multi-method approach – both interviews and surveys. Interviews are first conducted with shippers to explore truck-sharing usage motives. Next, quantitative surveys of both shippers and carriers are conducted to rank those motives.FindingsThe study identifies five motives (operational efficiency goal, quick transport solution, sustainability policy, convenience-seeking behavior and secure transport process) for truck-sharing, four critical transport attributes (lower charges for freight, distance travelled, full capacity utilization and environmental recognition), four psychological consequences (monetary savings, greater safety, instant availability of trips and clarification of environmental values), and six core values (secure transport process, being careful of money, ease of doing business, sustainability, status in the community and recognition by customers of shippers).Research limitations/implicationsThe qualitative results will help researchers better understand how usage motives influence shippers' willingness to share a truck for transport needs. The quantitative results are useful for ranking truck-sharing motives by their importance.Practical implicationsBased on the findings, managers of carriers can categorize shippers according to their specific needs and thereby customize promotions to attract more shippers.Originality/valueThe findings provide the first, exploratory insights into shippers' motives.

show abstract

“…In this scenario, tools and techniques need to be used to select the best way of distribution taking into account the multicriteria nature of the problem. The set of data and criteria were the same used by De La Vega et al (2018) to develop a decision model involving SMARTS and Goal Programming. However, it is noteworthy that this research is different as it evaluates in detail the importance of the criteria for choosing the FTL and LTL modes.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The software also aggregates the utilities in a global value and, thus, suggests an alternative as a final solution to the decision problem. In addition, the quantitative criteria (referring to cost and lead time) were previously optimized (see De La Vega et al, 2018).…”

Section: Lp/nlpmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is understood that this solution is the most suitable for the purpose of maximizing the performance of the distribution system in relation to the priorities and risk aversion of decision makers. Figure 5 also presents the solution generated by the combined judgments of the decision makers (8) as the second most adequate alternative followed by the solution that optimizes costs jointly (4) and the current approximate solution of the company (9), as can be seen in De La Vega et al (2018). It is important to note that, in parentheses, the percentage of demand met with the FTL for each alternative is presented.…”

Section: Presentation and Criteria Analysis For Choosing Ftl And Ltl Modesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Criteria analysis for deciding the LTL and FTL modes of transport

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choosing between Less Than Truckload (LTL) and Full Truckload (FTL) is based on a multicriteria decision because it takes into account aspects such as costs and operational efficiency in transportation, handling and stock of goods. The aim of this article is to provide a detailed analysis of the criteria that comprise the LTL and FTL transport decision using a multicriteria methodology that considers decision makers´ preferences. The SMARTS method was applied in a telecommunications company that outsources its logistics operation. Results show that the main criteria for choosing LTL shipment are related to the relationship with the customer and the efficiency in the delivery of the freight (reliability of the delivery time). On the other hand, choosing FTL transport requires a high weight given to the criteria regarding benefits and cost of transit inventory. The contribution of the research is to provide a structured and flexible analysis to choose the types of shipment (FTL and FLT) when taking into account the risk aversion of decision makers using a non-optimal approach, but with approximate solutions encompassing several qualitative and quantitative criteria in this choice.

show abstract

A decision on the truckload and less-than-truckload problem: An approach based on MCDA

Cited by 15 publications

References 36 publications

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Exploring shippers' motivations to adopt collaborative truck-sharing initiatives

Criteria analysis for deciding the LTL and FTL modes of transport

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About