2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2182207
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] A Decision‐Making Framework for University Student Sports Study Psychological Healthy Evaluation with 2‐Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers

Abstract: A healthy body is the foundation of education, and the guiding ideology of health first requires that all educational work in schools should take the health of students as the starting point and be responsible for the health of students. Taking the development of students as the foundation, its essential meaning is to make students develop into a “complete person,” that is, to integrate and unify students’ morality, intelligence, physique, beauty, life, habits, morality, skills, and other elements. The establi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generalized 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic power HM (G2TLNPHM) operator is defined based on the G2TLNHM operator [71] and PA operator [74]. Definition 6.…”
Section: The G2tlnphm Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generalized 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic power HM (G2TLNPHM) operator is defined based on the G2TLNHM operator [71] and PA operator [74]. Definition 6.…”
Section: The G2tlnphm Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The existing decision approaches just consider distance-based similarity degree [52,67,68] and information fusion [53,[69][70][71]. How to investigate the decision methods consider the interrelationships among any number of arguments is an interesting topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%