2019
DOI: 10.3897/bdj.7.e36783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deafening silence: a lack of data and reproducibility in published bioacoustics research?

Abstract: A study of 100 papers from five journals that make use of bioacoustic recordings shows that only a minority (21%) deposit any of the recordings in a repository, supplementary materials section or a personal website. This lack of deposition hinders re-use of the raw data by other researchers, prevents the reproduction of a project's analyses and confirmation of its findings and impedes progress within the broader bioacoustics community. We make some recommendations for researchers interested in depositing their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns have been raised about a lack of reproducibility in bioacoustic research that may be impeding progress 41 . The present study uses a published open-source CNN architecture, a publicly-released richly annotated birdsong dataset and additional code made available in a repository 42 to encourage other researchers to replicate the present results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns have been raised about a lack of reproducibility in bioacoustic research that may be impeding progress 41 . The present study uses a published open-source CNN architecture, a publicly-released richly annotated birdsong dataset and additional code made available in a repository 42 to encourage other researchers to replicate the present results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software based automation in acoustic analysis is an important step in ensuring reproducible results, which in turns spurs the growth of the research field (McFee et al 2018;Baker and Vincent 2019). The itsfm package written in the Python (Van Rossum and Drake Jr 1995) language is an open-sourced method which may be used in the analysis of animal vocalisations such as CF-FM bat calls, and other vocalisations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While code descriptions help explaining the principles behind design, it is not sufficient to ensure uniformity or correctness in implementation. Differences in implementation may lead to differences in scientific results (Baker and Vincent 2019; McFee et al 2018). Publishing code as publicly available packages allows for external code inspection and improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include bird [52,56,32,17,16] and bat [89,65] species classification. Like their image counterparts, these datasets can be challenging to collect and accurately annotate [8]. These annotation issues can also be compounded by factors such as background noise and low quality recordings.…”
Section: Image Audio and Video Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%