A current state of metal additive manufacturing methods: A review

Murugan, P. Durai; Vijayananth, S.; Natarajan, M.; Jayabalakrishnan, D.; Arul, K.; Jayaseelan, V.; Elanchezhian, J.

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.503

Cited by 29 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, only in the last few years, the sensible reduction of the cost of printers and of the production times, also for large sizes objects, combined with the wide range of materials/filaments available, led to a real large scale spread of this technology [ 3 , 5 , 8 , 11 ]. Currently, AM systems involve the use of several technologies and different materials [ 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An overview of the main additive manufacturing methods according to the classification proposed by ISO/ASTM Standard 52,900 is given in Fig. 1 [ 1 , 3 , 11 , 13 , 14 ]. The classification defines seven macro-categories of printing techniques, distinguishing them depending on the production technology, the specific materials and the final properties of the printed component.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

3D-printed metals: Process parameters effects on mechanical properties of 17-4 P H stainless steel

Andreacola

Capasso

Langella

et al. 2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D-printed metals: Process parameters effects on mechanical properties of 17-4 P H stainless steel

Andreacola

Capasso

Langella

et al. 2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Meniscus-confined electrodeposition forming uses nozzle-extruded droplets in contact with the substrate, and the reaction of reduced metal occurs within this tiny droplet. The formed part has high internal quality but is printed only at microscopic dimensions [1][2][3][4]. Consequently, it makes sense to research a metal additive manufacturing method with both low-cost and high-quality.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extruded 3D Printing Assisted Electrochemical Additive Manufacturing

Liang

Xu²,

Zhang³

et al. 2023

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay investigates an additive manufacturing technique of an extruded 3D printing-assisted electrochemical deposition. The effects of solutions with different additive (Cl− and brightener) concentrations on the surface micromorphology and deposition rate of the formed films were investigated by using characterization data from test tools such as an electrochemical workstation, X-ray diffractometer, and scanning electron microscope, as well as discussing the laws of interaction between these two additives during the electrodeposition process. The experimental results show that when the concentration of Cl− in the copper plating solution is 2×10−3 mol/L and the brightener concentration is 10 ml/L, the electrodeposition experiments yielded deposited copper films with a significantly preferred orientation on the (111) crystal plane, and the prepared copper film has thicker deposited film and better surface quality. To validate the additive manufacturing method for extruded 3D printing-assisted electrochemical deposition, deposition experiments of 25-layer copper samples were carried out utilizing the best process parameters.

show abstract

“…Additive manufacturing is a more efficient and cheaper forming technique than traditional processing methods [1][2][3]. It provides a new direction of development for modern manufacturing because of its innovative nature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metallurgical and Mechanical Characteristics of an AA5183 Alloy Plate Performed by a Cold Metal Low-Power Additive Manufacturing Technology

Jia

Hayat

et al. 2023

Crystals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, an AA5183 alloy plate was successfully deposited by low-power cold metal transfer technology. The forming defects, microstructural characteristics, and mechanical properties were investigated. The results show that the number of defects increases gradually along the building direction of the deposited plate. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, electron probe microanalysis, electron backscatter diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy were employed to study the distribution of alloying elements, deposited microstructural characteristics, and the crystal structure of intermetallic compounds in the Al alloy plate. The tensile samples perpendicular to the building direction presented greater tensile strength and superior plasticity compared to those parallel to the deposition direction. The average UTS was 327 ± 0.65 MPa and the average EL was 30.6 ± 2.0%. The UTS of conventionally forged 5083-H32 (Al-Mg4.5) alloy is 324 MPa; the UTS of extruded 5083-H116 (Al-Mg4.5) alloy is 305 MPa. Further, the strength of our prepared plate reaches the value needed for industrial applications of the 5083 Al alloy. The differences in the strength and plasticity of the samples assessed under multiple sampling methods were analyzed based on a synergistic strength–ductility mechanism.

show abstract

A current state of metal additive manufacturing methods: A review

Cited by 29 publications

References 39 publications

3D-printed metals: Process parameters effects on mechanical properties of 17-4 P H stainless steel

3D-printed metals: Process parameters effects on mechanical properties of 17-4 P H stainless steel

Extruded 3D Printing Assisted Electrochemical Additive Manufacturing

Metallurgical and Mechanical Characteristics of an AA5183 Alloy Plate Performed by a Cold Metal Low-Power Additive Manufacturing Technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About