2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12540-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cumulative-risk assessment method based on an artificial neural network model for the water environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomly generate 10,000 similar services for each node, and randomly generate QoS attribute values for each service, and convert them into values within a certain range according to the standardization of the attribute values, which is convenient for calculation. In order to improve the accuracy, each experiment was run 500 times, and the most suitable service was selected from 10,000 services each time, compare this method with Improved Genetic Algorithm (IGA) [35] and Artificial Neural Network Algorithm (ANNA) [36].…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Other Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomly generate 10,000 similar services for each node, and randomly generate QoS attribute values for each service, and convert them into values within a certain range according to the standardization of the attribute values, which is convenient for calculation. In order to improve the accuracy, each experiment was run 500 times, and the most suitable service was selected from 10,000 services each time, compare this method with Improved Genetic Algorithm (IGA) [35] and Artificial Neural Network Algorithm (ANNA) [36].…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Other Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each hidden layer includes multiple neurons that receive the values of neurons from the prior layer, process the input with activation functions, and transmit the outcomes to the neurons in the next layer with specific weights. We set the number of hidden layers and neurons for each layer with a trial‐and‐error process used in similar DFNN‐based research (Jiang et al., 2013; Leung et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2021). The process includes (i) arbitrarily determining the initial setting of neural network structure (i.e., number of layers and number of neurons in each layer) and (ii) adjusting the setting to improve the performance of the neural network.…”
Section: Developing Deep Risk Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, ANN has been applied in numerous elds, including water environmental monitoring and assessment (Aghav et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2021). Shi et al (2021) analyzed the back propagation arti cial neural network, a self-adapting algorithm, proposed to assess cumulative risks to aquatic ecosystems. Daiem et al (2018) utilized that submerged bio lter media (plastic and gravel) under the in uence of different variables such as temperature (18.00-28.50°C), ow rate (272.16-768.96 m 3 /day), and in uent COD (55.50-148.90 ppm) combined with two radial basis function neural network (a conventional and based on particle swarm optimization) to accurately predict the removal of COD from polluted water streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%