2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.48968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crystal structure of a collaborative RNA regulatory complex reveals mechanisms to refine target specificity

Abstract: In the Caenorhabditis elegans germline, fem-3 Binding Factor (FBF) partners with LST-1 to maintain stem cells. A crystal structure of an FBF-2/LST-1/RNA complex revealed that FBF-2 recognizes a short RNA motif different from the characteristic 9-nt FBF binding element, and compact motif recognition coincided with curvature changes in the FBF-2 scaffold. Previously, we engineered FBF-2 to favor recognition of shorter RNA motifs without curvature change (Bhat et al., 2019). In vitro selection of RNAs bound by FB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
55
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutational analysis of Drosophila Pumilio revealed the amino acids mediating contacts with the mRNA and protein partners (Zamore et al, 1997;Wharton et al, 1998;Wharton, 1999, 2001). Subsequent structural studies of Drosophila, C. elegans, and mammalian PUFs extended the genetic and biochemical data and have identified the TRMs that contact RNA on the concave surface as well as the sites on the convex surface that interact with protein partners (Edwards et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2002Wang et al, , 2009Campbell et al, 2014;Bhat et al, 2019;Qiu et al, 2019). Differences in the PUF RNA-binding domains result in distinct RNA motifs bound by PUF homologs.…”
Section: Mechanisms Behind Functional Divergence Of Puf Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mutational analysis of Drosophila Pumilio revealed the amino acids mediating contacts with the mRNA and protein partners (Zamore et al, 1997;Wharton et al, 1998;Wharton, 1999, 2001). Subsequent structural studies of Drosophila, C. elegans, and mammalian PUFs extended the genetic and biochemical data and have identified the TRMs that contact RNA on the concave surface as well as the sites on the convex surface that interact with protein partners (Edwards et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2002Wang et al, , 2009Campbell et al, 2014;Bhat et al, 2019;Qiu et al, 2019). Differences in the PUF RNA-binding domains result in distinct RNA motifs bound by PUF homologs.…”
Section: Mechanisms Behind Functional Divergence Of Puf Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using SEQRS (in vitro selection, high-throughput sequencing of RNA, and sequence specificity landscapes), analysis of RNA-binding preference of FBF-2 PUF domain bound to a 150-amino-acid LST-1 fragment FIGURE 3 | Modification of FBF biological activity though interactions with protein partners. (A) On its own, FBF PUF domain binds to target mRNAs containing a canonical 9-nt motif (Wang et al, 2009;Bhat et al, 2019;Qiu et al, 2019). (B) FBF PUF domain's RNA-binding specificity can be influenced by interactions with protein partners such as CPB-1 (Menichelli et al, 2013) and LST-1 (Qiu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Protein Cofactors That Change Rna Target Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the sequence specificity by PUM-HD across species can be predicted from the identity of these three key amino acids across the helical repeats in any given PUM-HD [9]. Thus, there are slight differences in the exact set of sequences recognized by the PUM-HD of different PUF family members and, in addition, interactions with protein partners can alter sequence preference [1012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%