Highlights d Barcoded reporters enable high-resolution mapping of transcriptional propensity d Ribosomal RNA operons are located in the center of highly transcribable regions d Nucleoid-associated proteins Fis and H-NS are predictive of transcriptional propensity d Genes involved in core metabolic processes are enriched in highly transcribable regions

The global regulator Lrp plays a crucial role in regulating metabolism, virulence, and motility in response to environmental conditions. Lrp has previously been shown to activate or repress approximately 10% of the genes in Escherichia coli. However, the full spectrum of targets, and how Lrp acts to regulate them, have stymied earlier study. We have combined matched chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) under nine physiological conditions to comprehensively map the binding and regulatory activity of Lrp as it directs responses to nutrient abundance. In addition to identifying hundreds of novel Lrp targets, we observe two new global trends, as follows: first, that Lrp will often bind to promoters in a poised position under conditions when it has no regulatory activity to enable combinatorial interactions with other regulators, and second, that nutrient levels induce a global shift in the equilibrium between less-sequencespecific and more-sequence-specific DNA binding. The overall regulatory behavior of Lrp, which as we now show extends to 38% of E. coli genes directly or indirectly under at least one condition, thus arises from the interaction between changes in Lrp binding specificity and cooperative action with other regulators. IMPORTANCE To survive, bacteria such as E. coli must rapidly respond to changing environmental conditions, including nutrient levels. A decrease in nutrient availability causes bacteria to stop rapid replication and enter stationary phase, where they perform limited to no cell division. The E. coli global regulatory protein Lrp has been previously implicated in modulating the expression of genes particularly important at this transition from rapid to slowed growth. Here, we monitor Lrp's DNA binding locations and effect on gene expression under three different nutrient conditions across three growth stages. We find that Lrp's role is even broader than previously suspected and that it appears to interact with many other bacterial regulators to perform its function in a condition-specific manner.

The human PUF-family proteins, PUM1 and PUM2, post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression by binding to a PUM recognition element (PRE) in the 3' UTR of target mRNAs. Hundreds of PUM1/2 targets have been identified from changes in steady state RNA levels; however, prior studies could not differentiate between the contributions of changes in transcription and RNA decay rates. We applied metabolic labeling to measure changes in RNA turnover in response to depletion of PUM1/2, showing that human PUM proteins regulate expression almost exclusively by changing RNA stability. We also applied an in vitro selection workflow to precisely identify the binding preferences of PUM1 and PUM2. By integrating our results with prior knowledge, we developed a 'rulebook' of key contextual features that differentiate functional vs. non-functional PREs, allowing us to train machine learning models that accurately predict the functional regulation of RNA targets by the human PUM proteins.

The global regulator Lrp plays a crucial role in regulating metabolism, virulence and motility in response to environmental conditions. Lrp has previously been shown to activate or repress approximately 10% of genes in Escherichia coli . However, the full spectrum of targets, and how Lrp acts to regulate them, has stymied earlier study. We have combined matched ChIP-seq and RNA sequencing under nine physiological conditions to map the binding and regulatory activity of Lrp as it directs responses to nutrient abundance. In addition to identifying hundreds of novel Lrp targets, we observe two new global trends: first, that Lrp will often bind to promoters in a poised position under conditions when it has no regulatory activity, and second, that nutrient levels induce a global shift in the equilibrium between non-specific and sequence-specific DNA binding. The overall regulatory behavior of Lrp, which as we now show regulates 35% of E. coli genes directly or indirectly under at least one condition, thus arises from the interaction between changes in Lrp binding specificity and cooperative action with other regulators.

No abstract