2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crystal plasticity analysis of length-scale dependent internal stresses with image effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the influence of surface roughness parameters, subsurface microstructure, and inhomogeneities such as precipitates or microcracks on the interaction length scale and surface cracking need to be yet investigated [35,61]. In summary, these results highlight a critical need for studying single-and multiasperity contact beyond the elastic limit [62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the influence of surface roughness parameters, subsurface microstructure, and inhomogeneities such as precipitates or microcracks on the interaction length scale and surface cracking need to be yet investigated [35,61]. In summary, these results highlight a critical need for studying single-and multiasperity contact beyond the elastic limit [62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The elastic constants and the magnitude of the Burgers vectors of aluminum are adopted here, i.e., l = 26.3 Gpa, m = 0.33 and b = 0.25 nm. According to many previous works (Bittencourt et al, 2003;Fredriksson and Gudmundson, 2005;Aifantis et al, 2006;Liu et al, 2011;Aghababaei and Joshi, 2012;Mayeur and McDowell, 2013), the bulk material length scale R varies from tens of nanometers to several microns, thus we take an intermediate value here, i.e., R = 0.5 lm. By fitting the numerical simulation results to the experiments data, Hurtado and Ortiz (2012) obtained a value of 90.0 N/m for C 1 of nickel greatly in excess of the corresponding known surface free energy density, which is attributed to the considerable surface damage of the samples in experiments during the manufacturing process.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%