2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13673-020-00230-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crowdsourcing method for online social networks security assessment based on human-centric computing

Abstract: Crowdsourcing and crowd computing are a trend that is likely to be increasingly popular, and there remain a number of research and operational challenges that need to be addressed. The human-centric computational abstraction called situation may be used to cope with these difficulties. In this paper, we focus on one such challenge, which is how to assign crowd assessment tasks about security and privacy in online social networks to the most appropriate users efficiently, effectively and accurately. Specificall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the case of responding to the survey, users might be attentive and an element of bias may creep in the responses. We, therefore, can safely assume that social media data contains unbiased data (in terms of intrinsic behaviour of the user), which is also supported by the studies (e.g., Bharati & Chaudhury, 2019;Meire et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020). However, a recent article on a survey of the social media analytics literature revealed that social media data is a source of high-quality information.…”
Section: Discussion On Remedy Reproducibility and Generalizability In...mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, in the case of responding to the survey, users might be attentive and an element of bias may creep in the responses. We, therefore, can safely assume that social media data contains unbiased data (in terms of intrinsic behaviour of the user), which is also supported by the studies (e.g., Bharati & Chaudhury, 2019;Meire et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020). However, a recent article on a survey of the social media analytics literature revealed that social media data is a source of high-quality information.…”
Section: Discussion On Remedy Reproducibility and Generalizability In...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The literature suggests that there has been a focus on investigating social media data for demand forecasting, impact on morale enhancement, customer empowerment, intention to purchase and disaster management (Iftikhar & Khan, 2020; Johnston et al, 2013; Nisar & Whitehead, 2016; See-To & Ho, 2014; Wu & Cui, 2018). Social media data reflects the actual behavior of users rather than the declarations by the respondents (Bharati & Chaudhury, 2019; Zhang et al, 2020). Nowadays, both primary survey data and secondary data directly crawled from social networking sites have been used by the researchers.…”
Section: Data Collection and Data Types In Social Media Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies conducted by Zhang and Gupta (2018), Kim, Gupta, andRho (2018), andZhang et al (2020) propose a model for providing digital security to users by crowdsourcing the entities from the existing pool of users. Similarly, the authors propose the selection of influencers from the pool of Redditors based on the number of posts generated by them and the number of comments received for each post.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nano-influencers could act as a liaison between brands and customers and may hold the potential to influence customer sentiments, however the selection of the right nano-influencer is a challenge for organizations (Belanche et al, 2021;Lee and Eastin, 2021;Sun et al, 2021). To help them select the right influencer from the pool, we have proposed the scheme developed by Zhang et al (2020) that is based on crowdsourcing to identify the users to assess the Nanoinfluencers and sports community privacy and security in social networks. We have defined task-related factors and their attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%