1984
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.52.2.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-validation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery.

Abstract: Special thanks are due David McAllister and William McMordie, as well as to the many staff members and patients whose cooperation made this work possible.Requests for reprints should be sent to James Sears,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schemata such as the Luria-Nebraska (or, for that matter, the Halstead procedures), which are validated primarily with respect to the accuracy with which they classify brainimpaired subjects, are hard pressed on the current results to contribute to a more fundamental understanding of neurobehavioral systems (Delis & Kaplan, 1983; Goldstein & Shelly, 1984; Satz & Fletcher, 1981; Sears, Hirt, & Hall, 1984). This is not to deny, however, the clinical merits of either the Halstead procedures or the more newly developed Luria-Nebraska.…”
Section: Canonical Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schemata such as the Luria-Nebraska (or, for that matter, the Halstead procedures), which are validated primarily with respect to the accuracy with which they classify brainimpaired subjects, are hard pressed on the current results to contribute to a more fundamental understanding of neurobehavioral systems (Delis & Kaplan, 1983; Goldstein & Shelly, 1984; Satz & Fletcher, 1981; Sears, Hirt, & Hall, 1984). This is not to deny, however, the clinical merits of either the Halstead procedures or the more newly developed Luria-Nebraska.…”
Section: Canonical Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%