2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sectional study of Salmonella in pre-slaughter pigs in a production compartment of northern Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These serovars were also present in the environment before the cutting process, with Salmonella Rissen being the most prevalent serotype in the cutting environment, possibly being transmitted directly from the pigs. Padungtod and Kaneene (2006) and Dorn-in et al (2009) have found that Salmonella Rissen is the most common serotype found in pigs and the environment of pig farms, whereas Salmonella Derby, which is also associated with pigs in Thailand (Bangtrakulnonth et al, 2004), has not been detected in our study.…”
contrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These serovars were also present in the environment before the cutting process, with Salmonella Rissen being the most prevalent serotype in the cutting environment, possibly being transmitted directly from the pigs. Padungtod and Kaneene (2006) and Dorn-in et al (2009) have found that Salmonella Rissen is the most common serotype found in pigs and the environment of pig farms, whereas Salmonella Derby, which is also associated with pigs in Thailand (Bangtrakulnonth et al, 2004), has not been detected in our study.…”
contrasting
confidence: 68%
“…A comprehensive quality safety and assurance scheme, such as Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point or Good Manufacturing Practice, which also includes staff educational programs, should help to increase the level of awareness of food hygiene at the farm and abattoir level even more effectively (Borch et al, 1996;Legnani et al, 2004;van der Gaag et al, 2004). The risk of contamination of pork and pork products might depend on highly contaminated pigs at the preharvest stage (Dorn-in et al, 2009) and at the slaughtering stage (Chantong, 2005). Our results show the effects of postharvest processing on the retail product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This serovar accounted for 1.9% (n ϭ 64) of salmonellosis cases in 1993 and 10.1% of cases (n ϭ 141) in 2003 (23). Salmonella serovar Stanley is a serovar generally associated with pig and pork production but is neither host restricted nor host adapted (16,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, Padungtod and Kaneene [30] reported that the prevalence of Salmonella isolation from pre-slaughter pigs (6%) and chickens (4%) was at a low level in Thailand. However, serological testing of the pigs yielded a much higher sero-prevalence (60%) [16,33], suggesting that pigs may be exposed to Salmonella during the raising period, but that they may not shed the bacteria at the farms. However, when pork and chicken meat samples were collected from the same area during the same period of time, the prevalence of Salmonella contamination in both pork and chicken meat increased significantly [30].…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Selected Foodborne Bac-teriamentioning
confidence: 99%