2020
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross‐sectional study of distress: A cancer response

Abstract: Aim To describe the experience of distress in people with cancer of working age. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, patients (N = 168) with both ongoing (N = 56) and completed treatment (N = 105) completed the Distress Thermometer and the detailed problem list. Data were analysed by descriptive and analytical statistics. Results A large proportion of patients (29%) continued to experience high distress (>3 according to the Distress Thermometer) even after treatment was compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean number of problems endorsed also parallels another study that reported 7.62 ± 5.75 mean items endorsed by cancer patients at risk for distress [4]. The rate of types of problems endorsed, sampled from a cancer rehabilitation clinic in Sweden, is similarly high for worry, fatigue, sleep, memory, pain, skin dryness/itch, and tingling [25]. Further, among the common problems reported by cancer survivors, emotional concerns, loss of interest in usual activities, finance, fatigue, work/school, and sleep may be the most distressing, evidencing the need for a holistic approach in cancer rehabilitation to deal with a mixed array of psychosocial and physical problems [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The mean number of problems endorsed also parallels another study that reported 7.62 ± 5.75 mean items endorsed by cancer patients at risk for distress [4]. The rate of types of problems endorsed, sampled from a cancer rehabilitation clinic in Sweden, is similarly high for worry, fatigue, sleep, memory, pain, skin dryness/itch, and tingling [25]. Further, among the common problems reported by cancer survivors, emotional concerns, loss of interest in usual activities, finance, fatigue, work/school, and sleep may be the most distressing, evidencing the need for a holistic approach in cancer rehabilitation to deal with a mixed array of psychosocial and physical problems [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, while the DT is recommended routine screening for distress in all cancer patients since1999 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 56 . The DT was developed as a simple tool to effectively screen for symptoms of distress and offers a user-friendly screening tool 57 , its limitations in addressing the multifaceted nature of different problems, such as pain, and distress in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients should be recognized, and supplementary assessments or tools may be necessary for a more in-depth understanding of this complex relationship. We would like to clarify that our study primarily aimed to explore the microbiome's potential links with depressive tendencies as measured by the DT scale, rather than to establish a direct causative relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na referida pesquisa, 384 pacientes responderam a um questionário com o objetivo de investigar a experiência de reabilitação de sobreviventes do câncer em idade produtiva. Como resultado, observou-se um alto grau de sofrimento (>3) de acordo com o instrumento Termômetro do Distress em diversas áreas problemáticas elencadas, mais de 50% da amostra afirmou que os problemas financeiros traziam um altíssimo grau de sofrimento durante e após o tratamento 12 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified