2015
DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2015.1044080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-cultural study of possible iatrogenic effects of gifted education programs: tenth graders’ perceptions of academically high performing classmates

Abstract: . (2015) A cross-cultural study of possible iatrogenic effects of gifted education programs: tenth grader's perceptions of academically high-performing classmates. High Ability Studies, 26(1), pp. 152-166. (doi:10.1080Studies, 26(1), pp. 152-166. (doi:10. /13598139.2015 This is the author's final accepted version.There may be differences between this version and the published version. Abstract Previous empirical studies have yielded inconclusive results about peer perceptions of academically high-performing st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, it may seem paradoxical that gifted individuals who are rich in educational and learning capitals and have good opportunities to develop need in turn even more educational and learning capitals to cope with the consequences of this development. A popular example from the giftedness literature shows that this assumption is not a paradox at all: Teachers might feel threatened by their gifted students or peers may denounce their gifted peers as nerds, both of which are unpleasant experiences for many gifted students; they must then devise coping strategies and therefore require more resources (Oh et al, 2015). Thus, the focus on positive developments has to be done with an eye on the possible unwanted side effects of individual growth.…”
Section: New Perspectives For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, it may seem paradoxical that gifted individuals who are rich in educational and learning capitals and have good opportunities to develop need in turn even more educational and learning capitals to cope with the consequences of this development. A popular example from the giftedness literature shows that this assumption is not a paradox at all: Teachers might feel threatened by their gifted students or peers may denounce their gifted peers as nerds, both of which are unpleasant experiences for many gifted students; they must then devise coping strategies and therefore require more resources (Oh et al, 2015). Thus, the focus on positive developments has to be done with an eye on the possible unwanted side effects of individual growth.…”
Section: New Perspectives For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration the increasing governmental support given to high-achieving youth living in poverty, on-going cross-cultural studies were launched with the support of the University of Nuremberg and the International Research Association for Talent Development and Excellence (Oh et al, 2015). Because COAR schools are mainly residential, it is of utmost importance to assess the perception of teachers and peers toward gifted boys and girls.…”
Section: Practice and Policy Issues: Perumentioning
confidence: 99%