A cross-cultural comparison of resilience in adolescents

Hunter, Anita

doi:10.1053/jpdn.2001.24180

Cited by 95 publications

(81 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, with regard to the environmental components, social supports such as family, friends, and the school environment have been confirmed as factors that affect adolescents’ resilience (Dray et al, 2015; Hunter, 2001; Tiet et al, 1998), which is consistent with the results of the present study. Some countries, such as the UK, have formulated and implemented programmes aimed at promoting children’s resilience based on the role of the school (Challen, Machin, & Gillham, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Characteristics and components of children’s and adolescents’ resilience in disasters in Iran: a qualitative study

Mohammadinia

Khorasani‐Zavareh

Ebadi

et al. 2018

International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Children and adolescents are vulnerable in times of disaster and they will suffer more severely if neglected. The concept of resilience differs between cultures, and identifying the components of resilience is essential for decision making and interventions in disasters such as risk management. This study aimed to identify the components of children’s resilience in disasters in Iran. This qualitative study took a content-analysis approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 23 people and three group meetings. Conventional content analysis was used for data analysis. MAXQDA 10 software was used for classification. The resilience components derived from the data were categorized into two main categories, internal and external, and eight subcategories covering psychological, emotional, cognitive, mental, spiritual, physical, social, and behavioral factors. The results also showed that the nature of resilience is both intrinsic and extrinsic. Recognizing the dimensions of children’s resilience in disasters can lead to a new perspective for authorities and planners in disaster and emergency situations. The results of this study could be used by planners and policymakers to develop interventions to enhance children’s and adolescents’ resilience at the time of disasters, which is also underlined and highlighted by international documents.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Characteristics and components of children’s and adolescents’ resilience in disasters in Iran: a qualitative study

Mohammadinia

Khorasani‐Zavareh

Ebadi

et al. 2018

International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…group-level) protective factors or barriers (Sameroff & Rosenblum, 2006), just as the somatic immune system is explored in the context of trade-off with somatic hygiene (Yazdanbakhsh et al, 2002). As is found with vaccinations, group resilience factors can affect (transform or suppress) the development of individual resilience (Hunter, 2001). …”

Section: Some Challenges For Future Resilience Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and mental health

Davydov¹,

Stewart²,

Ritchie

et al. 2010

Clinical Psychology Review

910

729

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Prevalence studies of psychological distress and it's impact among adolescents in Nigeria is limited, with varying rates of distress reported, ranging between 15% and 50% (6-8, Fatoye, 1998 andIkegwuonu, 2009, unpublished report). Resilience to distress in adolescents has been conflictingly reported to be associated with high rates of depression and anxiety on one hand (9)(10), and also with lower rates of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideas (11)(12)(13). Family factors, such as polygamy (Fatoye, 1998, unpublished report), lower socio-economic class, divorce and separation, have also been reported as risk factors for the development of psychological problems in adolescents (14)(15)(16)(17).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%