2018
DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2018.1542019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-cultural comparison of expectations in romantic relationships: India and the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This unequal distribution of power is also preserved in their dating practices, whereby one partner has more power and status in the relationship than the other. Individuals belonging to these countries may also look at dating as an opportunity to gain status by pairing up with partners who belong to a higher social stratum compared to them (Cionea et al, 2019). Thus, advertisements targeting high-power distance societies will appeal to people’s need to gain status and dominance to preserve this social disparity (Cheong et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unequal distribution of power is also preserved in their dating practices, whereby one partner has more power and status in the relationship than the other. Individuals belonging to these countries may also look at dating as an opportunity to gain status by pairing up with partners who belong to a higher social stratum compared to them (Cionea et al, 2019). Thus, advertisements targeting high-power distance societies will appeal to people’s need to gain status and dominance to preserve this social disparity (Cheong et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pada penelitian ini, EVT digunakan bersama dengan disposition theory dan parasocial relationship theory. Studi lain menggunakan EVT bersama dengan social identity approach (Nicholls & Rice, 2017), teori penetrasi sosial (S. Y. , model relasional (Cionea et al, 2019), Modality Agency-Interactivity-Navigability (MAIN) Model (Waddell, 2018), communicative reciprocity dan paralinguistic digital affordances (Carr et al, 2018), confirmation bias (Tao, 2018), structural equation modeling dan two-group model (J. Lee, 2020), dan social entrainment theory (Kalman et al, 2021).…”
Section: Diskusimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, 2020), komunikasi antarpribadi (Bennett et al, 2020Bippus & Young, 2020), komunikasi kesehatan (Logos et al, 2021;. Selain itu, ditemukan pula konteks komunikasi termediasi komputer, hubungan antarbudaya, forum dukungan online, komunikasi pemasaran, krisis komunikasi dan komunikasi sains (Bogomoletc & Lee, 2021;Cionea et al, 2019;Li et al, 2018;Nicholls & Rice, 2017;Tao & Song, 2020;.…”
Section: Diskusiunclassified
“…Looser cultures tolerate a broader range of behaviour and are more permissive, whereas tighter cultures have stricter norms and greater conformity to social rules. In tight societies, such as India, young adults, despite their growing independence, appear to have less autonomy compared to Western societies, where greater freedom is granted in making choices concerning relationships, including their formation and termination, with a large number of non-committal relationships [ 50 , 51 ]. In the current study, we have selected these two countries for their different cultural characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%