1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3205-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique of Validation/Verification Techniques for Software Development Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches to the validation of software metrics can be found in the literature. Gustafson et al (1992) present a classification of validation studies of software metrics. In their view, validation checks the predictive abilities of a measure against a dependent variable, while verification checks the reasonableness of the measure.…”
Section: Relation With Other Validation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other approaches to the validation of software metrics can be found in the literature. Gustafson et al (1992) present a classification of validation studies of software metrics. In their view, validation checks the predictive abilities of a measure against a dependent variable, while verification checks the reasonableness of the measure.…”
Section: Relation With Other Validation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development process is usually not a linear process, but will be iterated in a spiral development. The approaches distinguished by Gustafson et al (1992) may have their own merits in different phases of this spiral process. A standard on validation issues in software measurement is urgently required (cf.…”
Section: Relation With Other Validation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%