2021
DOI: 10.1515/zaw-2021-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique of Torleif Elgvin’s Reconstructions of 1QSamuel

Abstract: The article by Torleif Elgvin in ZAW 132/2 (2020): 281–300 fails in the material reconstruction of 1QSam. Considering the different width of the columns correctly, the manuscript could well have contained all parts of 2Sam 20–23 which makes further speculations superfluous.

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles